AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Management scheme influence and nitrogen addition effects on soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes in a Moso bamboo plantation

Junbo Zhang1Quan Li1Jianhua Lv1Changhui Peng2Zhikang Gu3Lianghua Qi4Xuzhong Song5Xinzhang Song1 ( )
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Department of Biology Sciences, Institute of Environment Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Case Postale 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal H3C 3P8, Canada
Huzhou Research Institute of Forestry, Huzhou 313000, China
International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102, China
Zhejiang Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 310023, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

It is still not clear whether the effects of N deposition on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are influenced by plantation management schemes. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of conventional management (CM) versus intensive management (IM), in combination with simulated N deposition levels of control (ambient N deposition), 30 kg N·ha-1·year-1 (N30, ambient + 30 kg N·ha-1·year-1), 60 kg N·ha-1·year-1 (N60, ambient + 60 kg N·ha-1·year-1), or 90 kg N·ha-1·year-1 (N90, ambient + 90 kg N·ha-1·year-1) on soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes. For this, 24 plots were set up in a Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) plantation from January 2013 to December 2015. Gas samples were collected monthly from January 2015 to December 2015.

Results

Compared with CM, IM significantly increased soil CO2 emissions and their temperature sensitivity (Q10) but had no significant effects on soil CH4 uptake or N2O emissions. In the CM plots, N30 and N60 significantly increased soil CO2 emissions, while N60 and N90 significantly increased soil N2O emissions. In the IM plots, N30 and N60 significantly increased soil CO2 and N2O emissions, while N60 and N90 significantly decreased soil CH4 uptake. Overall, in both CM and IM plots, N30 and N60 significantly increased global warming potentials, whereas N90 did not significantly affect global warming potential. However, N addition significantly decreased the Q10 value of soil CO2 emissions under IM but not under CM. Soil microbial biomass carbon was significantly and positively correlated with soil CO2 and N2O emissions but significantly and negatively correlated with soil CH4 uptake.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that management scheme effects should be considered when assessing the effect of atmospheric N deposition on GHG emissions in bamboo plantations.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 6

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang J, Li Q, Lv J, et al. Management scheme influence and nitrogen addition effects on soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes in a Moso bamboo plantation. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00285-0

1035

Views

46

Downloads

21

Crossref

24

Web of Science

23

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 09 June 2020
Accepted: 13 January 2021
Published: 02 February 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.