Journal Home > Volume 7 , Issue 2
Background

Much land is subject to damage by construction, development and exploitation with consequent loss of environmental function and services. How might the loss be recovered?

Results

This article develops principles of environmental rehabilitation. Key issues include the following. Rehabilitation means restoring the previous condition. Whether or not to restore is not a technical but a value judgement. It is subject to adopting the sustainability ethic. If the ethic is followed under rule of law then rehabilitation must be done always to 'the high standard' which means handing down unimpaired environmental function and no extra land management. The elements of the former condition that it is intended to restore must be specified. Restoring these in any given case is the purpose of that rehabilitation project. The specified restoration elements must be easily measurable with a few simple powerful metrics. Some land damage is not fixable so restraint must be exercised in what construction, development and exploitation are permitted. If sustainability is adopted then cost benefit analysis is not a valid form of project appraisal because trading off present benefits against future losses relies on subjectively decided discount rates, and because natural capital is hard to price, indispensable, irreplaceable and non-substitutable. Elements often to be restored include agricultural land capability, landscape form and environmental function. Land capability is a widely used convention and, with landscape form, encapsulate many key land factors, and are easily measurable. Restoring soil and thereby environmental function provides the necessary base for an ecological pyramid.

Conclusions

The need for rehabilitation is not to be justified by cost-benefit or scientific and technological proof, but rests on a value judgement to sustain natural capital for present and future generations. Decision on what activities and projects to permit should be based on what is physically and financially fixable on current knowledge. Business and government must be proactive, develop rehabilitation standards, work out how to meet the standards, design simple powerful metrics to measure performance against the standards, embark on continuous improvement, and report.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Environmental rehabilitation of damaged land

Show Author's information Mike Mentis( )
Postnet 540, Bag X9, Benmore 2010, South Africa

Abstract

Background

Much land is subject to damage by construction, development and exploitation with consequent loss of environmental function and services. How might the loss be recovered?

Results

This article develops principles of environmental rehabilitation. Key issues include the following. Rehabilitation means restoring the previous condition. Whether or not to restore is not a technical but a value judgement. It is subject to adopting the sustainability ethic. If the ethic is followed under rule of law then rehabilitation must be done always to 'the high standard' which means handing down unimpaired environmental function and no extra land management. The elements of the former condition that it is intended to restore must be specified. Restoring these in any given case is the purpose of that rehabilitation project. The specified restoration elements must be easily measurable with a few simple powerful metrics. Some land damage is not fixable so restraint must be exercised in what construction, development and exploitation are permitted. If sustainability is adopted then cost benefit analysis is not a valid form of project appraisal because trading off present benefits against future losses relies on subjectively decided discount rates, and because natural capital is hard to price, indispensable, irreplaceable and non-substitutable. Elements often to be restored include agricultural land capability, landscape form and environmental function. Land capability is a widely used convention and, with landscape form, encapsulate many key land factors, and are easily measurable. Restoring soil and thereby environmental function provides the necessary base for an ecological pyramid.

Conclusions

The need for rehabilitation is not to be justified by cost-benefit or scientific and technological proof, but rests on a value judgement to sustain natural capital for present and future generations. Decision on what activities and projects to permit should be based on what is physically and financially fixable on current knowledge. Business and government must be proactive, develop rehabilitation standards, work out how to meet the standards, design simple powerful metrics to measure performance against the standards, embark on continuous improvement, and report.

Keywords: Sustainability, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Cost benefit analysis, Environmental function, Land capability, Landscape form, Natural capital

References(30)

Bell RW (2002) Restoration of degraded landscapes: principles and lessons from case studies with salt-affected land and mine revegetation. CMU J 1(1):1-21

Bell RW (2013) Land restoration. In: Jorgensen SE (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental management. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, USA
CER (2019) The truth about Mpumalanga coal mines failure to comply with their water use licences. Centre for Environmental Rights, Cape Town
Davidson RL (1964) An experimental study of succession in the Transvaal Highveld. In: Davis DHS (ed) Ecological studies in southern Africa. Junk, The Hague
De Klerk LP, Claasen M (2015) Proceedings of the workshop on South Africa mining-related landscape rehabilitation status quo: identifying research work required to close knowledge gaps. Report to Water Research Commission. CSIR report no.: CSIR/WR/2015/00/10/C
Drucker PF (1967) The effective executive. Heinemann, London

Farber DA, Hemmersbaugh PA (1993) The shadow of the future: discount rates, later generations and the environment. Vanderbilt Law Rev 46:267-304

Groysberg B, Lee J, Price J, Cheng Y (2018) The leader's guide to corporate culture: how to manage the eight critical elements of organizational life. Harvard Bus Rev January-February 2018, p 44-52
Hancock GR, Martin Duque JF, Willgoose GR (2019) Geomorphic design and modelling at catchment scale for best mine rehabilitation - The Drayton mine example (New South Wales, Australia). Environ Model Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.12.003
DOI
Hatting R, Tanner P, Aken M (2019) Land rehabilitation guidelines for surface coal mines. Land rehabilitation Society of Southern Africa, CoalTech, Minerals Council of South Africa
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, London

Kahneman D, Rosenfield AM, Gandhi L, Blaser T (2016) Noise. Harvard Bus Rev, October 2016:38-46

Macdonald SE, Landhäuser SM, Skousen J, Franklin J, Frouz J, Hall S, Jacobs DF, Quideau S (2015) Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions. New For 46:706-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9506-4

Martinez-Paz J, Amansa C, Casanovas V, Colin J (2016) Pooling expert opinion on environmental discounting: an international Delphi survey. Conserv Soc 14:243-253

Mentis M (2015) Managing project risks and uncertainties. Forest Ecosyst 2:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-014-0026-z

Mentis M (2019) Environmental rehabilitation guide for South Africa. Quickfox, Johannesburg

Mentis MT (1999) Diagnosis of the rehabilitation of opencast coal mines on the Highveld of South Africa. South Afr J Sci 95:210-215

Mentis MT (2006) Restoring native grassland on land disturbed by coal mining on the eastern Highveld of South Africa. South Afr J Sci 102:193-197

Mentis MT, Ellery WN (1998) Environmental effects of mining coastal dunes: conjectures and refutations. South Afr J Sci 94:215-222

Murphy BW (2014) Soil organic matter and soil function - review of the literature and underlying data. Department of the Environment, Canberra
Parkinson CN (1958) Parkinson's law: the pursuit of Progress. John Murray, London

Parotta JA, Knowles OH (1999) Restoration of tropical moist forests on bauxite-mined land in the Brazilian Amazon. Restor Ecol 7(2):103-116

Pearce D, Markandya A, Barbier EB (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan Publications, London.
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1998) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate.In: Portr ME (Ed) On Competition. Harvard Business Review Book, Boston, pp351-375.
Roux E (1969) Grass: a story of Frankenwald. Oxford University Press, Cape Town
Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. Harper & Row, New York

Snyman HA, Ingram LJ, Kirkman KP (2013) Themeda triandra: a keystone grass species. Afr J Range For Sci 30:99-125

Taleb NN (2001) Fooled by randomness: the hidden role of chance in life and in the markets. Penguin Random House, London
Tanner P, Möhr-Swart M (2007) Guidelines for the rehabilitation of mined land. Chamber of Mines of South Africa/Coal Tech, Johannesburg
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, USA
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 12 October 2019
Accepted: 23 March 2020
Published: 06 April 2020
Issue date: June 2020

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Adriaan Oosthuizen for drawing attention to geomorphic landscape design.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return