AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.9 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Re-estimating the changes and ranges of forest biomass carbon in China during the past 40 years

Xiaolu Zhouv1,2 Xiangdong Lei3Caixia Liu4Huabing Huang4Carl Zhou5Changhui Peng1,2
Research Center for Ecological Forecasting and Global Change, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China
Ecological Modeling and Carbon Science, Department of Biology Science, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

In recent decades the future of global forests has been a matter of increasing concern,particularly in relation to the threat of forest ecosystem responses under potential climate change. To the future predictions of these responses,the current forest biomass carbon storage (FCS) should first be clarified as much as possible,especially at national scales. However,few studies have introduced how to verify an FCS estimate by delimiting the reasonable ranges. This paper addresses an estimation of national FCS and its verification using two-step process to narrow the uncertainty. Our study focuses on a methodology for reducing the uncertainty resulted by converting from growing stock volume to above- and below-ground biomass (AB biomass),so as to eliminate the significant bias in national scale estimations.

Methods

We recommend splitting the estimation into two parts,one part for stem and the other part for AB biomass to preclude possible significant bias. Our method estimates the stem biomass from volume and wood density (WD),and converts the AB biomass from stem biomass by using allometric relationships.

Results

Based on the presented two-step process,the estimation of China's FCS is performed as an example to explicate how to infer the ranges of national FCS. The experimental results demonstrate a national FCS estimation within the reasonable ranges (relative errors: + 4.46% and - 4.44%),e.g.,5.6-6.1 PgC for China's forest ecosystem at the beginning of the 2010s. These ranges are less than 0.52 PgC for confirming each FCS estimate of different periods during the last 40 years. In addition,our results suggest the upper-limits by specifying a highly impractical value of WD (0.7 t∙m- 3) on the national scale. As a control reference,this value decides what estimate is impossible to achieve for the FCS estimates.

Conclusions

Presented methodological analysis highlights the possibility to determine a range that the true value could be located in. The two-step process will help to verify national FCS and also to reduce uncertainty in related studies. While the true value of national FCS is immeasurable,our work should motivate future studies that explore new estimations to approach the true value by narrowing the uncertainty in FCS estimations on national and global scales.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 51

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhouv X, Lei X, Liu C, et al. Re-estimating the changes and ranges of forest biomass carbon in China during the past 40 years. Forest Ecosystems, 2019, 6(4): 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0208-9

593

Views

20

Downloads

18

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

17

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 April 2019
Accepted: 14 November 2019
Published: 13 December 2019
© The Author(s) 2019.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.