Open Access
Issue
Published:
14 October 2019
Quantification of occlusions influencing the tree stem curve retrieving from single-scan terrestrial laser scanning data
),
Download citation
319
Views
5
Downloads
12
Crossref
N/A
WoS
16
Scopus
0
CSCD
The stem curve of standing trees is an essential parameter for accurate estimation of stem volume. This study aims to directly quantify the occlusions within the single-scan terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data, evaluate its correlation with the accuracy of the retrieved stem curves, and subsequently, to assess the capacity of single-scan TLS to estimate stem curves.
We proposed an index, occlusion rate, to quantify the occlusion level in TLS data. We then analyzed three influencing factors for the occlusion rate: the percentage of basal area near the scanning center, the scanning distance and the source of occlusions. Finally, we evaluated the effects of occlusions on stem curve estimates from single-scan TLS data.
The results showed that the correlations between the occlusion rate and the stem curve estimation accuracies were strong (r = 0.60-0.83), so was the correlations between the occlusion rate and its influencing factors (r = 0.84-0.99). It also showed that the occlusions from tree stems were the main factor of the low detection rate of stems, while the non-stem components mainly influenced the completeness of the retrieved stem curves.
Our study demonstrates that the occlusions significantly affect the accuracy of stem curve retrieval from the single-scan TLS data in a typical-size (32 m × 32 m) forest plot. However, the single-scan mode has the capacity to accurately estimate the stem curve in a small forest plot (< 10 m × 10 m) or a plot with a lower occlusion rate, such as less than 35% in our tested datasets. The findings from this study are useful for guiding the practice of retrieving forest parameters using single-scan TLS data.
menu
Quantification of occlusions influencing the tree stem curve retrieving from single-scan terrestrial laser scanning data
),
Abstract
The stem curve of standing trees is an essential parameter for accurate estimation of stem volume. This study aims to directly quantify the occlusions within the single-scan terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data, evaluate its correlation with the accuracy of the retrieved stem curves, and subsequently, to assess the capacity of single-scan TLS to estimate stem curves.
We proposed an index, occlusion rate, to quantify the occlusion level in TLS data. We then analyzed three influencing factors for the occlusion rate: the percentage of basal area near the scanning center, the scanning distance and the source of occlusions. Finally, we evaluated the effects of occlusions on stem curve estimates from single-scan TLS data.
The results showed that the correlations between the occlusion rate and the stem curve estimation accuracies were strong (r = 0.60-0.83), so was the correlations between the occlusion rate and its influencing factors (r = 0.84-0.99). It also showed that the occlusions from tree stems were the main factor of the low detection rate of stems, while the non-stem components mainly influenced the completeness of the retrieved stem curves.
Our study demonstrates that the occlusions significantly affect the accuracy of stem curve retrieval from the single-scan TLS data in a typical-size (32 m × 32 m) forest plot. However, the single-scan mode has the capacity to accurately estimate the stem curve in a small forest plot (< 10 m × 10 m) or a plot with a lower occlusion rate, such as less than 35% in our tested datasets. The findings from this study are useful for guiding the practice of retrieving forest parameters using single-scan TLS data.
References(37)
Abegg M, Kükenbrink D, Zell J, Schaepman ME, Morsdorf F (2017) Terrestrial laser scanning for forest inventories—tree diameter distribution and scanner location impact on occlusion. Forests 8(6):184
Astrup R, Ducey MJ, Granhus A, Ritter T, von Lupke N (2014) Approaches for estimating stand-level volume using terrestrial laser scanning in a single-scan mode. Can J For Res 44(6):666-676
Clark NA, Wynne RH, Schmoldt DL (2000) A review of past research on dendrometers. For Sci 46:570-576
Corral-Rivas JJ, Diéguez-Aranda U, Rivas SC, Dorado FC (2007) A merchantable volume system for major pine species in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). For Ecol Manag 238:118-129
Dassot M, Constant T, Fournier M (2011) The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges. Ann For Sci 68:959-974
Drew DM, Downes GM (2018) Growth at the microscale: long term thinning effects on patterns and timing of intra-annual stem increment in radiata pine. Forest Ecosyst 5:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0153-z
Hämmerle M, Lukač N, Chen K-C, Zs K, Wang C-K, Anders K, Höfle B (2017) Simulating various terrestrial and UAV Lidar scanning configurations for understory forest structure modelling. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci Ⅳ-2(W4):59-65. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-59-2017
Kalantari H, Fallah A, Hodjati SM, Parsakhoo A (2012) Determination of the most appropriate form factor equation for Cupresus sempervirence L. var horizentalis in the north of Iran. Adv Appl Sci Res 3:644-648
Kankare V, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Puttonen E, Yu X, Hyyppä J, Vaaja M, Hyyppä H, Alho P (2013) Individual tree biomass estimation using terrestrial laser scanning. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 75:64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.10.003
Kelbe D, van Aardt J, Romanczyk P, van Leeuwen M, Cawse-Nicholson K (2015) Single-scan stem reconstruction using low-resolution terrestrial laser scanner data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8:3414-3427. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2416001
Liang X, Hyyppä J, Kaartinen H, Lehtomaki M, Pyorala J, Pfeifer N, Holopainen M, Brolly G, Pirotti F, Hackenberg J, Huang HB, Jo HW, Katoh M, Liu LX, Mokros M, Morel J, Olofsson K, Poveda-Lopez J, Trochta J, Wang D, Wang JH, Xi ZX, Yang BS, Zheng G, Kankare V, Luoma V, Yu XW, Chen L, Vastaranta M, Saarinen N, Wang YS (2018) International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 144:137-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.021
Liang X, Hyyppä J, Kankare V, Holopainen M (2013) Stem curve measurement using terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52:1739-1748
Liang X, Litkey P, Hyyppa J et al (2012) Automatic stem mapping using single-scan terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50:661-670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2161613
Lovell JL, Jupp DLB, Newnham GJ, Culvenor DS (2011) Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66:46-55
Lundgren C (2000) Predicting log type and knot size category using external log shape data from a 3D log scanner. Scand J For Res 15:119-126
Özçelik R, Wiant HV Jr, Brooks JR (2008) Accuracy using xylometry of log volume estimates for two tree species in Turkey. Scand J For Res 23:272-277
Pueschel P (2013) The influence of scanner parameters on the extraction of tree metrics from FARO photon 120 terrestrial laser scans. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 78:58-68
Pueschel P, Newnham G, Rock G et al (2013) The influence of scan mode and circle fitting on tree stem detection, stem diameter and volume extraction from terrestrial laser scans. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 77:44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.12.001
Stovall AEL, Vorster AG, Anderson RS et al (2017) Non-destructive aboveground biomass estimation of coniferous trees using terrestrial LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 200:31-42
Trochta J, Král K, Janík D, Adam D (2013) Arrangement of terrestrial laser scanner positions for area-wide stem mapping of natural forests. Can J For Res 43:355-363. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2012-0347
Van der Zande D, Hoet W, Jonckheere I et al (2006) Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure. Agric For Meteorol 141:147-160
Watt PJ, Donoghue DNM (2005) Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning. Int J Remote Sens 26:1437-1446
Wilkes P, Lau A, Disney M et al (2017) Data acquisition considerations for terrestrial laser scanning of forest plots. Remote Sens Environ 196:140-153
Xu L, Oja E (1993) Randomized Hough transform (RHT): basic mechanisms, algorithms, and computational complexities. CVGIP Image Underst 57:131-154
Xu L, Oja E, Kultanen P (1990) A new curve detection method: randomized Hough transform (RHT). Pattern Recogn Lett 11:331-338
Yu X, Liang X, Hyyppä J et al (2013) Stem biomass estimation based on stem reconstruction from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds. Remote Sens Lett 4:344-353
Zhang W, Chen Y, Wang H et al (2016a) Efficient registration of terrestrial LiDAR scans using a coarse-to-fine strategy for forestry applications. Agric For Meteorol 225:8-23
Zhang W, Qi J, Wan P et al (2016b) An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sens 8:501. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060501
Zhang W, Wan P, Wang T et al (2019) A novel approach for the detection of standing tree stems from plot-level terrestrial laser scanning data. Remote Sens 11(2):211. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020211
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
FEEDBACK 
TOP