Journal Home > Volume 5 , Issue 3
Background

The main objective of this study was to examine the climatic sensitivity of the radial growth response of 13 eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) provenances planted at seven test sites throughout the northern part of the species' native distribution in eastern North America.

Methods

The test sites (i.e., Wabeno, Wisconsin, USA; Manistique, Michigan, USA; Pine River, Michigan, USA; Newaygo, Michigan, USA; Turkey Point, Ontario, Canada; Ganaraska, Ontario, Canada; and Orono, Maine, USA) examined in this study were part of a range-wide white pine provenance trial established in the early 1960s in the eastern United States and Canada. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to examine the main modes of variation [first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal component axes] in the standardized radial growth indices of the provenances at each test site. The year scores for PC1 and PC2 were examined in relation to an array of test site climate variables using multiple regression analysis to examine the commonality of growth response across all provenances to the climate of each test site. Provenance loadings on PC1 and PC2 were correlated with geographic parameters (i.e., latitude, longitude, elevation) and a suite of biophysical parameters associated with provenance origin location.

Results

The amount of variation in radial growth explained by PC1 and PC2 ranged from 43.4% to 89.6%. Dendroclimatic models revealed that white pine radial growth responses to climate were complex and differed among sites. The key dendroclimatic relationships observed included sensitivity to high temperature in winter and summer, cold temperature in the spring and fall (i.e., beginning and end of the growing season), summer moisture stress, potential sensitivity to storm-induced damage in spring and fall, and both positive and negative effects of higher winter snowfall. Separation of the loadings of provenances on principal component axes was mainly associated with temperature-related bioclimatic parameters of provenance origin at 5 of the 7 test sites close to the climate influence of the Great Lakes (i.e., Wabeno, Manistique, Pine River, Newaygo, and Turkey Point). In contrast, differences in radial growth response to climate at the Ganaraska test site, were driven more by precipitation-related bioclimatic parameters of the provenance origin location while radial growth at the easternmost Orono test site was independent of bioclimate at the provenance origin location.

Conclusions

Study results suggest that genetic adaptation to temperature and precipitation regime may significantly influence radial growth performance of white pine populations selected for use in assisted migration programs to better adapt white pine to a future climate.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Dendroclimatic analysis of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) using long-term provenance test sites across eastern North America

Show Author's information Sophan Chhin1( )Ronald S. Zalesny Jr2William C. Parker3John Brissette4
Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 322 Percival Hall, PO Box 6125, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5985 Highway K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA
Ontario Forest Research Institute, 1235 Queen St. E, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 2E5, Canada
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 271 Mast Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA

Abstract

Background

The main objective of this study was to examine the climatic sensitivity of the radial growth response of 13 eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) provenances planted at seven test sites throughout the northern part of the species' native distribution in eastern North America.

Methods

The test sites (i.e., Wabeno, Wisconsin, USA; Manistique, Michigan, USA; Pine River, Michigan, USA; Newaygo, Michigan, USA; Turkey Point, Ontario, Canada; Ganaraska, Ontario, Canada; and Orono, Maine, USA) examined in this study were part of a range-wide white pine provenance trial established in the early 1960s in the eastern United States and Canada. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to examine the main modes of variation [first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal component axes] in the standardized radial growth indices of the provenances at each test site. The year scores for PC1 and PC2 were examined in relation to an array of test site climate variables using multiple regression analysis to examine the commonality of growth response across all provenances to the climate of each test site. Provenance loadings on PC1 and PC2 were correlated with geographic parameters (i.e., latitude, longitude, elevation) and a suite of biophysical parameters associated with provenance origin location.

Results

The amount of variation in radial growth explained by PC1 and PC2 ranged from 43.4% to 89.6%. Dendroclimatic models revealed that white pine radial growth responses to climate were complex and differed among sites. The key dendroclimatic relationships observed included sensitivity to high temperature in winter and summer, cold temperature in the spring and fall (i.e., beginning and end of the growing season), summer moisture stress, potential sensitivity to storm-induced damage in spring and fall, and both positive and negative effects of higher winter snowfall. Separation of the loadings of provenances on principal component axes was mainly associated with temperature-related bioclimatic parameters of provenance origin at 5 of the 7 test sites close to the climate influence of the Great Lakes (i.e., Wabeno, Manistique, Pine River, Newaygo, and Turkey Point). In contrast, differences in radial growth response to climate at the Ganaraska test site, were driven more by precipitation-related bioclimatic parameters of the provenance origin location while radial growth at the easternmost Orono test site was independent of bioclimate at the provenance origin location.

Conclusions

Study results suggest that genetic adaptation to temperature and precipitation regime may significantly influence radial growth performance of white pine populations selected for use in assisted migration programs to better adapt white pine to a future climate.

Keywords: Climate change, Adaptation, Dendrochronology, Seed source

References(57)

Abrams MD, van de Gevel S, Dodson RC, Copenheaver CA (2000) The dendroecology and climatic impacts for old-growth white pine and hemlock on the extreme slopes of the Berkshire Hills, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Can J Bot 78:851–861

Alexander RM, Perschel R (2009) A review of forestry mitigation and adaptation strategies in the northeast US. Clim Chang 96:167–183

Black BA, Abrams MD (2005) Disturbance history and climate response in an old-growth hemlock-white pine forest, central Pennsylvania. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:103–114

Chen P-Y, Welsh C, Hamann A (2010) Geographic variation in growth response of Douglas-fir to interannual climate variability and projected climate change. Glob Chang Biol 16:3374–3385

Chhin S (2010) Influence of climate on growth of hybrid poplar in Michigan. Forests 1:209–229

Chhin S (2015) Impact of future climate change on a genetic plantation of hybrid pine. Botany 93:397–404

Chhin S, Chumack K, Dahl TA, David ET, Kurzeja P, Magruder M, Telewski FW (2013) Growth-climate relationships of Pinus strobus in a floodway versus terrace forest along the banks of the red Cedar River, Michigan. Tree-ring Res 69:37–47

Chhin S, Hogg EH, Lieffers VJ, Huang S (2008) Potential effects of climate change on the growth of lodgepole pine across diameter size classes and ecological regions. Forest Ecol Manag 256:1692–1703

Cook ER (1985) A Time Series Analysis Approach to Tree Ring Standardization. PhD Thesis. University of Arizona
Core Team R (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 December 2014

Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PP (2008) Physiologically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Intl. J Climatol 28:2031–2064

Eilmann B, Sterck F, Wegner L, de Vries SMG, von Arx G, Mohren GMJ, den Ouden J, Sass-Klaassen U (2014) Wood structural differences between northern and southern beech provenances growing at a moderate site. Tree Physiol 34:882–893

Everham EM, Brokaw NVL (1996) Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot Rev 62:113–185

Fritts HC (1976) Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, Inc., London, UK

Genys JB (1987) Provenance variation among different provenances of Pinus strobus from Canada and the United States. Can J For Res 17:228–235

Graumlich LJ (1993) Response of tree growth to climatic variation in the mixed conifer and deciduous forest of the upper Great Lakes region. Can J For Res 23:133–143

Gray LK, Rweyongeza D, Hamann A, John S, Thomas BR (2016) Developing management strategies for tree improvement programs under climate change: insights gained from long-term field trials with lodgepole pine. Forest Ecol Manag 377:128–138

Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Res 57:205–221

Hamann A, Wang T, Spittlehouse DL, Murdock TQ (2013) A comprehensive, high resolution database of historical and projected climate surfaces for western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1307–1309

Handler S, Duveneck MJ, Iverson L, Peters E, Scheller RM, Wythers KR, Brandt L, Butler P, Janowiak M, Swanston C, Clark Eagle A, Cohen JG, Corner R, Reich PB, Baker T, Chhin S, Clark E, Fehringer D, Fosgitt J, Gries J, Hall KR, Hall C, Heyd R, Hoving CL, Ibanez I, Kuhr D, Matthews S, Muladore J, Nadelhoffer K, Neumann D, Peters M, Prasad A, Sands M, Swaty R, Wonch L, Daley J, Davenport M, Emery MR, Johnson G, Johnson L, Neitzel D, Rissman A, Rittenhouse C, Ziel R (2014) Michigan Forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Northwoods climate change response framework. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-129. Newtown Square, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, p 229https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-129
DOI
Havranek WM, Tranquillini W (1995) Physiological processes during winter dormancy and their ecological significance. In: Smith WK, Hinckley TM (eds) Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. Academic press, San Diego, California, pp 95–124https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-092593-6.50010-4
DOI

Hogg EH (1997) Temporal scaling of moisture and the forest-grassland boundary in western Canada. Agric For Meteorol 84:115–122

Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bull 43:69–75

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Summary for policymakers. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of working groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, p 104

Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M (2008) Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern U.S. tree species under six climate scenarios. Forest Ecol Manag 254:390–406

Iverson LR, Thompson FR Ⅲ, Matthews S, Peters M, Prasad A, Dijak WD, Fraser J, Wang WJ, Hanberry B, He H, Janowiak M, Butler P, Brandt L, Swanston C (2017) Multi-model comparison on the effects of climate change on tree species in the eastern U.S.: results from an enhanced niche model and process-based ecosystem and landscape models. Landsc Ecol 32:1327–1346

Joyce DG, Lu P, Sinclair RW (2002) Genetic variation in height growth among populations of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) in Ontario. Silv Genet 51:136–142

Joyce DG, Rehfeldt GE (2013) Climatic niche, ecological genetics, and impact of climate change on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.): guidelines for land managers. Forest Ecol Manag 295:173–192

Kilgore JS, Telewski FW (2004) Climate-growth relationships for native and nonnative Pinaceae in northern Michigan's pine barrens. Tree-ring Res 60:3–13

King GM, Gugerli F, Fonti P, Frank DC (2013) Tree growth response along an elevational gradient: climate or genetics? Oecologia 173:1587–1600

King JP, Nienstaedt H (1969) Variation in eastern white pine seed sources planted in the Lake states. Silv Genet 18:83–86

Kipfmueller KF, Elliott GP, Larson ER, Salzer MW (2010) An assessment of the dendroclimatic potential of three conifer species in northern Minnesota. Tree-ring Res 66:113–126

Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of Woody plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

DOI

Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd Ed. developments in environmental modeling 20. Elsevier science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Lu P, Joyce DG, Sinclair RW (2003a) Geographic variation in cold hardiness among eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) provenances in Ontario. Forest Ecol Manag 178:329–340

Lu P, Joyce DG, Sinclair RW (2003b) Effect of selection on shoot elongation rhythm of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and its implications to seed transfer in Ontario. Forest Ecol Manag 182:161–173

McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Lawrence K, Campbell K, Hutchinson MF (2007) Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of north American trees. Bioscience 57:939–948

McLane SC, Daniels LD, Aitken SN (2011) Climate impacts on lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) radial growth in a provenance experiment. Forest Ecol Manag 262:115–123

Mickler RA, Birdsey RA, Hom J (2000) Responses of northern U.S. forests to environmental change. Springer, NY, p 578

DOI

Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151

Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

Peters EB, Wythers HK, Zhang S, Bradford JB, Reich PB (2013) Potential climate change impacts on temperate forest ecosystem processes. Can J For Res 43:939–950

Peterson CJ (2000) Catastrophic wind damage to north American forests and the potential impact of climate change. Sci Total Environ 262:287–311

Pluess AR, Weber P (2012) Drought-adaptation potential in Fagus sylvatica: linking moisture availability with genetic diversity and dendrochronology. PLoS ONE 7:Article e33636

Rehfeldt GE, Yin CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton Jr D (1999) Genetic responses to climate change in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change and reforestation. Ecol Monogr 69:373–407

Scott RW, Huff FA (1996) Impacts of the Great Lakes on regional climate conditions. J Great Lakes Res 22:845–863

Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1996) An introduction to tree-ring dating. The University of Arizona Press. Tucson, Arizona

Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York

DOI

Vose JM, Swank WT (1994) Effects of long-term drought on the hydrology and growth of a white pine plantation in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecol Manag 64:25–39

Wang T, Hamann A, Yanchuk A, O'Neill GA, Aitken SN (2006) Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Glob Chang Biol 12:2404–2416

Wang T, O'Neill GA, Aitken SN (2010) Integrating environmental and genetic effects to predict responses of tree populations to climate. Ecol Appl 20:153–163

Wendel GW, Smith HC (1990) Pinus strobus L. eastern white pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: volume 1, conifers. Agricultural handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 476–488
White TL, Addams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest genetics. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK
Wright JW (1970) Genetics of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). USDA Forest Service res. Pap. WO-9. Washington, DC, p 16

Yang J, Pedlar JH, McKenney DW, Weersink A (2015) The development of universal response functions to facilitate climate-smart regeneration of black spruce and white pine in Ontario, Canada. Forest Ecol Manag 339:34–43

Zalesny RS Jr, Headlee WL (2015) Developing woody crops for the enhancement of ecosystem services under changing climates in the north Central United States. J Forest Exp Sci 31: 78–90

Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 06 November 2017
Accepted: 13 February 2018
Published: 13 March 2018
Issue date: September 2018

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to N. Eskelin, B. Brown, J. Winters, P. Lu, S. Colombo, K. Finley, K. Minnix, I. Allen, B. Birr, and A. Wiese for assistance with field and laboratory data collection. We are grateful to E. Bauer, Dr. W. Headlee, and two anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The conclusions and opinions in this paper are those of the authors and not the Northeastern States Research Cooperative (NSRC), the US Forest Service, or the USDA.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return