AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Diversity and production in an Afromontane Forest

Klaus v. Gadow1,2 ( ), GongQiao Zhang3, Graham Durrheim4, David Drew1, Armin Seydack4
Georg-August University in G?ttingen, G?ttingen, Germany
Department of Forestry and Wood Science, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Chinese Academy of Forestry in Beijing, Beijing, China
South African National Parks, Knysna, South Africa
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

This contribution evaluates the effect of forest structure and tree species diversity on plot productivity and individual tree growth in the unique Knysna forests in Southern Africa using mapped tree data from an observational study that has been re-measured over a period of 40 years.

Methods

The effects of tree species diversity and forest structure on tree growth and forest production are evaluated on three levels of resolution: a) the forest community (canopy,sub-canopy species),b) the subplots (number of trees per ha,skewness of the diameter distribution,diameter coefficient of variation) and c) the immediate neighborhood of selected reference trees ("Mingling","Dominance",Aggregation" and "Size Variation").

Results

An analysis of the community level identified two distinct clusters,one including dominant/canopy species with the highest growth rates and a greater variation of growth,and another cluster which includes the remaining subcanopy species which have a smaller maximum size and lower rates of growth. The area-based structure variables on plot level have a highly significant effect on total basal area growth. However,the effects of forest density and species richness on productivity were not straight forward. Maximum basal area production of about 0.75 m2/ha/year is achieved at medium levels of richness (around 20 species per ha) and medium levels of density (around 30 m2/ha basal area) using percentile regression estimates. The relative "Dominance" of a selected reference tree had a highly significant effect on individual tree growth on all investigated species. Other neighbourhood structure variables were only occasionally significant or not significant at all.

Conclusion

This contribution presents a new theoretical framework for analysing natural forests that includes community,plot and neighborhood variables of forest structure and diversity,and a first specific analysis of the structure and dynamics of the Knysna Afromontane Forest,based on a unique set of longterm observations. The species-area (SAR) model developed in this study,represents a new general approach that can be used to derive a common standard of tree species diversity for different plot sizes,the species richness per hectare.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 15

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Gadow Kv, Zhang G, Durrheim G, et al. Diversity and production in an Afromontane Forest. Forest Ecosystems, 2016, 3(4): 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0074-7

1065

Views

57

Downloads

32

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

35

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 May 2016
Accepted: 29 June 2016
Published: 26 July 2016
© 2016 The Author(s).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.