Open Access
Issue
Published:
21 December 2015
Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?
),
Download citation
363
Views
9
Downloads
24
Crossref
N/A
WoS
31
Scopus
0
CSCD
In economically optimal management,trees that are removed in a thinning treatment should be selected on the basis of their value,relative value increment and the effect of removal on the growth of remaining trees. Large valuable trees with decreased value increment should be removed,especially when they overtop smaller trees.
This study optimized the tree selection rule in the thinning treatments of continuous cover management when the aim is to maximize the profitability of forest management. The weights of three criteria (stem value,relative value increment and effect of removal on the competition of remaining trees) were optimized together with thinning intervals.
The results confirmed the hypothesis that optimal thinning involves removing predominantly large trees. Increasing stumpage value,decreasing relative value increment,and increasing competitive influence increased the likelihood that removal is optimal decision. However,if the spatial distribution of trees is irregular,it is optimal to leave large trees in sparse places and remove somewhat smaller trees from dense places. However,the benefit of optimal thinning,as compared to diameter limit cutting is not usually large in pure one-species stands. On the contrary,removing the smallest trees from the stand may lead to significant (30-40 %) reductions in the net present value of harvest incomes.
menu
Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?
),
Abstract
In economically optimal management,trees that are removed in a thinning treatment should be selected on the basis of their value,relative value increment and the effect of removal on the growth of remaining trees. Large valuable trees with decreased value increment should be removed,especially when they overtop smaller trees.
This study optimized the tree selection rule in the thinning treatments of continuous cover management when the aim is to maximize the profitability of forest management. The weights of three criteria (stem value,relative value increment and effect of removal on the competition of remaining trees) were optimized together with thinning intervals.
The results confirmed the hypothesis that optimal thinning involves removing predominantly large trees. Increasing stumpage value,decreasing relative value increment,and increasing competitive influence increased the likelihood that removal is optimal decision. However,if the spatial distribution of trees is irregular,it is optimal to leave large trees in sparse places and remove somewhat smaller trees from dense places. However,the benefit of optimal thinning,as compared to diameter limit cutting is not usually large in pure one-species stands. On the contrary,removing the smallest trees from the stand may lead to significant (30-40 %) reductions in the net present value of harvest incomes.
References(23)
Eerikäinen K, Miina J, Valkonen S (2007) Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated stands of southern Finland. Forest Ecol Manage 242:444-461
Haight RG (1985) A comparison of dynamic and static economic models of uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 31(4):957-974
Haight RG (1987) Evaluating the efficiency of even-aged uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 33(1):116-134
Haight RG, Getz WM (1987) Fixed and equilibrium problems in uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 33(4):908-931
Haight RG, Monserud RA (1990) Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands: Ⅱ. Effects of decision criteria. Forest Sci 36(1):125-144
Hooke R, Jeeves TA (1961) "Direct search" solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 8:212-229
Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O, Valsta L (2005) Optimum juvenile density, harvesting and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands. Forest Sci 51:120-133
Laasasenaho J (1982) Taper curve and volume equations for pine spruce and birch. Communicationes Instuti Forestalis Fenniae 108:1-74
Miina J, Pukkala T (2000) Using numerical optimization for specifying individual-tree competition models. Forest Sci 46(2):277-281
Pukkala T (2015a) Optimizing continuous cover management of boreal forest when timber prices and tree growth are stochastic. Forest Ecosyst 2(6):1-13
Pukkala T, Miina J (1998) Tree-selection algorithms for optimizing thinning using a distance-dependent growth model. Can J Forest Res 28:693-702
Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2013) Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. J Sustain Forest 32:1-33
Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2014) Optimizing any-aged management of mixed boreal forest under residual basal area constraints. J Forest Res 23(3):727-636
Tahvonen O (2011) Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Res 42:2389-2402
Tahvonen O, Pukkala T, Laiho O, Lähde E, Niinimäki S (2010) Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. Forest Ecol Manage 260:106-115
Tahvonen O, Pihlainen S, Niinimäki S (2013) On the economics of optimal timber production in boreal Scots pine stands. Can J Forest Res 43:719-730
Valsta L (1992) A scenario approach to stochastic anticipatory optimization in stand management. Forest Sci 38(2):430-447
Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
FEEDBACK 
TOP