Journal Home > Volume 1 , Issue 4
Objective

The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem in Meghalaya, India represents the easternmost limit of sal distribution. We tested if tree diversity and compositional heterogeneity of this ecosystem was higher than other sal-dominated forests due to moister environment.

Methods

Vegetation was sampled in 11 transects of 10 m width and up to 500 m length covering 5.2 ha area. All stems ≥ 10 cm girth at breast height were enumerated.

Results

We found a pattern of mixed dominance of Shorea robusta (sal) and Schima wallichii and co-dominance of Pinus kesiya and Careya arborea. The Shannon's diversity index (H′) was 3.395 nats. This value is remarkably high and competitive to that of moist sal forests of eastern Himalayan foothills and sal-dominated forests of Tripura. A high value of H′ was manifested by: a) high species richness (S = 123), b) good equitability (70.6%), c) 'fair' resource apportionment, and d) abundance of rare species (84% species with less than one per cent of total individuals, 67% species with two or less individuals ha-1 and 59% species with one or less individuals ha-1). The compositional heterogeneity was 'fair' (Whittaker's βw = 3.15). The presence of Fagaceae with six species commanding 4.3% of importance value (IVI) and of a pine (P. kesiya) in sal forest was remarkable. As many as 58 species showed 'low density (≤ 10 individuals ha-1), uniform dispersion', five species achieved 'higher density (> 10 individuals ha-1), uniform dispersion' and six of the top 10 species were 'clumped'. The forest showed an exponential demographic curve illustrating 'good' regeneration of an expanding community. Vertical stratification was simple with a poor canopy and fair subcanopy, which together with low basal area (15.65 m2 · ha-1 for individuals ≥ 10 cm gbh) indicated logging of mature sal trees in the past.

Conclusion

The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem is richer in alpha and beta diversity than most sal-dominated forests, but past logging has reduced basal area. Selective removal of small timber and firewood, slash-and-burn agriculture and recurrent burning of forest floor are the principal anthropogenic factors controlling forest structure and regeneration of species.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Patterns of species dominance, diversity and dispersion in 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem in northeast India

Show Author's information Amit Kumar TripathiUma Shankar( )
Department of Botany, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793 022, India

Abstract

Objective

The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem in Meghalaya, India represents the easternmost limit of sal distribution. We tested if tree diversity and compositional heterogeneity of this ecosystem was higher than other sal-dominated forests due to moister environment.

Methods

Vegetation was sampled in 11 transects of 10 m width and up to 500 m length covering 5.2 ha area. All stems ≥ 10 cm girth at breast height were enumerated.

Results

We found a pattern of mixed dominance of Shorea robusta (sal) and Schima wallichii and co-dominance of Pinus kesiya and Careya arborea. The Shannon's diversity index (H′) was 3.395 nats. This value is remarkably high and competitive to that of moist sal forests of eastern Himalayan foothills and sal-dominated forests of Tripura. A high value of H′ was manifested by: a) high species richness (S = 123), b) good equitability (70.6%), c) 'fair' resource apportionment, and d) abundance of rare species (84% species with less than one per cent of total individuals, 67% species with two or less individuals ha-1 and 59% species with one or less individuals ha-1). The compositional heterogeneity was 'fair' (Whittaker's βw = 3.15). The presence of Fagaceae with six species commanding 4.3% of importance value (IVI) and of a pine (P. kesiya) in sal forest was remarkable. As many as 58 species showed 'low density (≤ 10 individuals ha-1), uniform dispersion', five species achieved 'higher density (> 10 individuals ha-1), uniform dispersion' and six of the top 10 species were 'clumped'. The forest showed an exponential demographic curve illustrating 'good' regeneration of an expanding community. Vertical stratification was simple with a poor canopy and fair subcanopy, which together with low basal area (15.65 m2 · ha-1 for individuals ≥ 10 cm gbh) indicated logging of mature sal trees in the past.

Conclusion

The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem is richer in alpha and beta diversity than most sal-dominated forests, but past logging has reduced basal area. Selective removal of small timber and firewood, slash-and-burn agriculture and recurrent burning of forest floor are the principal anthropogenic factors controlling forest structure and regeneration of species.

Keywords: Regeneration, Population structure, Forest structure, Phytosociology, Floristics, Beta diversity, Abundance, Species dispersion, Shorea robusta

References(44)

Anonymous (2014) Climate: Nongpoh., http://en.climate-data.org/location/48848/. AmbiWeb GmbH, Hans-Thoma-Str. 4, 76593 Gernsbach. Accessed 10 July 2014

Aubréville A (1938) La forêt coloniale: les forets de l'Afrique occidentale franҫaise. Ann Acad Sci Colon Paris 9:1–245

Balakrishnan NP (1981 & 1983) Flora of Jowai and Vicinity, Meghalaya, vol Ⅰ & Ⅱ. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, India
Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India, New Delhi

Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31:435–455

Deka J, Tripathi OP, Khan ML (2012) High dominance of Shorea robusta Gaertn. in Alluvial Plain Kamrup Sal Forest of Assam, N. E. India. Int J Ecosyst 2(4): 67–73https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ije.20120204.04
DOI
Dutta G, Devi A (2013a) Plant diversity and community structure in tropical moist deciduous sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forest of Assam, northeast India. J Environ Appl Biores 1(3): 1–4

Dutta G, Devi A (2013b) Plant diversity, population structure, and regeneration status in disturbed tropical forests in Assam, northeast India. J Forest Res 24(4):715–720

Gautam KH, Devoe NN (2006) Ecological and anthropogenic niches of sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.) forest and prospects for multiple-product forest management–a review. Forestry 79: 81–101https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi063
DOI
Gnasser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Greig-Smith P (1983) Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontola Electron 4(1): 9, http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
Haridasan K, Rao RR (1985 & 1987) Forest flora of Meghalaya, vol Ⅰ & Ⅱ. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India
Hooker JD (1872–1897) Flora of British India, vol Ⅰ through Ⅶ. L. Reeve and Company, London

Hubbell SP (1979) Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309

IUCN (2014) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1., http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 18 July 2014
Jain SK, Rao RR (1976) A Handbook of Field and Herbarium Methods. Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, New Delhi
Kanjilal UN, Kanjilal PC, Das A, De RN (1934–1940) Flora of Assam, vol Ⅰ through Ⅳ. Government of Assam, India

Kumar A, Marcot BG, Saxena A (2006) Tree species diversity and distribution patterns in tropical forests of Garo Hills. Curr Sci 91(10):1370–1381

Kushwaha SPS, Nandy S (2012) Species diversity and community structure in sal (Shorea robusta) forests of two different rainfall regimes in West Bengal, India. Biodivers Conserv 21:1215–1228

Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USAhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
DOI

Majumdar K, Shankar U, Dutta BK (2012) Tree species diversity and stand structure along major community types in lowland primary and secondary moist deciduous forests in Tripura, Northeast India. J Forest Res 23(4):553–568

Majumdar K, Dutta BK, Shankar U (2014) Lower altitudinal variation in habitat associations, tree diversity and co-dominant population structures along moist deciduous forests dominated by sal (Shorea robusta) in northeast India. Forest Sci Technol 10:1–12

Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
Murali KS, Shankar U, Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN, Bawa KS (1996) Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forest of Biligiri Rangan hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure and species composition. Econ Bot 50: 252–269https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907329
DOI

Myers N (2003) Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Bioscience 53:916–917

Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:502–515

Pandey SK, Shukla RP (2003) Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests of Gorakhpur, India: species composition, regeneration and conservation. Biodivers Conserv 12: 2295–2319
Pielou EC (1975) Ecological Diversity. Wiley, New York
Rahman MM, Nishat A, Vacik H (2011) Anthropogenic disturbances and plant diversity of the Madhupur Sal forests (Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn) of Bangladesh. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manage 5(3): 162–173https://doi.org/10.1080/17451590903236741
DOI
Richards PW (1952) The Tropical Rain Forest: an Ecological Study, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 450

Shankar U (2001) A case of high tree diversity in sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr Sci 81:776–786

Shankar U, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN (1991) Structure and seasonal dynamics of humid tropical grasslands in Meghalaya, India. J Veg Sci 2:711–714

Shankar U, Pandey HN, Tripathi RS (1993) Phytomass dynamics and primary productivity in humid grasslands along altitudinal and rainfall gradients. Acta Oecol 14:197–209

Shankar U, Lama SD, Bawa KS (1998a) Ecosystem reconstruction through 'taungya' plantations following commercial logging of a dry, mixed deciduous forest in Darjeeling Himalaya. Forest Ecol Manage 102:131–142

Shankar U, Murali KS, Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN, Bawa KS (1998b) Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forest of Biligiri Rangan hills, India. 4. Impact on floristic diversity and population structure in a thorn scrub forest. Econ Bot 52: 302–315https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862149
DOI

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(379–423):623–656

Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
DOI

Singh A, Reddy VS, Singh JS (1995) Analysis of woody vegetation of Corbett National Park. India Vegetatio 120:69–79

Tewari VP, Álvarez-gonzález JG, García O (2014) Developing a dynamic growth model for teak plantations in India. Forest Ecosyst 1: 9, doi: 10.1186/2197-5620-1-9https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-5620-1-9
DOI
The Plant List (2013) Version 1.1, http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 10 July 2014
Tiwari DN (1995) A Monograph on Sal (Shorea robusta). International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun, India
Troup RS (1921) The Silviculture of Indian Trees, vol Ⅰ–Ⅲ. Clarendon, Oxford

Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 05 August 2014
Accepted: 02 December 2014
Published: 17 December 2014
Issue date: December 2014

Copyright

© 2014 Tripathi and Shankar; licensee Springer.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India, New Delhi provided principal funding for this work through a project grant to US (grant number BT/PR7928/NDB/52/9/2006). AKT sincerely acknowledges a research fellowship from this project and from UGC's meritorious fellowship programme. The authors are grateful to Prof. K.N. Ganeshaiah, UAS, Bangalore for project design and encouragement and thank the custodians of forests in Meghalaya to permit field work, the Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Shillong for access to herbarium, and the Head, Department of Botany, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong for logistics. Invaluable help in the work rendered by D. Kumar, S. Borah and K. Nongrum is thankfully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Return