Open Access
Issue
Published:
21 September 2021
Egg rejection and egg recognition mechanisms in Oriental Reed Warblers
)
Download citation
464
Views
16
Downloads
8
Crossref
8
WoS
8
Scopus
0
CSCD
Nest parasitism by cuckoos (Cuculus spp.) results in enormous reproductive failure and forces hosts to evolve antiparasitic strategies, i.e., recognition of own eggs and rejection of cuckoo eggs. There are often sexual conflicts between male and female individuals in the expression of antiparasitic behavior due to the differences in reproductive inputs and division of labor.
By adding a foreign egg made of blue soft clay to the host nest during early incubation period in the field, and by removing several host eggs and adding experimental eggs to control the proportion of two egg types in the nest, we examined egg rejection ability, egg recognition mechanism and sexual difference in egg rejection of the Oriental Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis), one of the major hosts of Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus).
Our results indicated that Oriental Reed Warblers can recognize and reject nearly 100% (73/75) of the non-mimetic eggs made of blue soft clay, and they could reject foreign eggs with 100% accuracy, regardless of the ratio of experimental eggs and its own eggs in the nest. Furthermore, all cases of egg rejections recorded by videos were only carried out by females.
Oriental Reed Warblers have a high egg recognition ability and show a true recognition mechanism. Only female warblers perform egg rejection, suggesting that the sex for host egg incubation seems to play an important role in the evolution of egg recognition mechanisms.
menu
Egg rejection and egg recognition mechanisms in Oriental Reed Warblers
)
Abstract
Nest parasitism by cuckoos (Cuculus spp.) results in enormous reproductive failure and forces hosts to evolve antiparasitic strategies, i.e., recognition of own eggs and rejection of cuckoo eggs. There are often sexual conflicts between male and female individuals in the expression of antiparasitic behavior due to the differences in reproductive inputs and division of labor.
By adding a foreign egg made of blue soft clay to the host nest during early incubation period in the field, and by removing several host eggs and adding experimental eggs to control the proportion of two egg types in the nest, we examined egg rejection ability, egg recognition mechanism and sexual difference in egg rejection of the Oriental Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis), one of the major hosts of Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus).
Our results indicated that Oriental Reed Warblers can recognize and reject nearly 100% (73/75) of the non-mimetic eggs made of blue soft clay, and they could reject foreign eggs with 100% accuracy, regardless of the ratio of experimental eggs and its own eggs in the nest. Furthermore, all cases of egg rejections recorded by videos were only carried out by females.
Oriental Reed Warblers have a high egg recognition ability and show a true recognition mechanism. Only female warblers perform egg rejection, suggesting that the sex for host egg incubation seems to play an important role in the evolution of egg recognition mechanisms.
References(57)
Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk. 2006;123: 419-30.
Davies NB, deL Brooke M. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav. 1988;36: 262-84.
Davies NB, deL Brooke M. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol. 1989a;58: 207-24.
Davies NB, deL Brooke M. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. Ⅱ. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol. 1989b;58: 225-36.
deL Brooke M, Davies NB, Noble DG. Rapid decline of host defences in response to reduced cuckoo parasitism: behavioural flexibility of reed warblers in a changing world. Proc R Soc Lond B-Biol Sci. 1998;265: 1277-82.
Geltsch N, Bán M, Hauber ME, Moskát C. When should common cuckoos Cuculus canorus lay their eggs in host nests? Bird Study. 2016;63: 1-6.
Hauber ME, Sherman PW. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24: 609-16.
Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Čapek M, et al. Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol. 2004;22: 175-80.
Lahti DC. Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 18057-62.
Lahti DC. Persistence of egg recognition in the absence of cuckoo brood parasitism: pattern and mechanism. Evolution. 2006;60: 157-68.
Li D, Wei H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Stokke BG. Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) nest defence behaviour towards brood parasites and nest predators. Behaviour. 2015;152: 1601-21.
Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG. Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol. 2016;30: 905-23.
Li D, Li X, Zhang Y, Guan S, Ruan Y. Contrasting effects of egg size and appearance on egg recognition and rejection response by Oriental reed warblers. Ecol Evol. 2020;10: 11523-34.
Liang W, Yang C, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Stokke BG, Moksnes A. Sex roles in egg recognition and egg polymorphism in avian brood parasitism. Behav Ecol. 2012;23: 397-402.
Liang W, Møller AP, Stokke BG, Yang C, Kovařík P, Wang H, et al. Geographic variation in egg ejection rate by great tits across 2 continents. Behav Ecol. 2016;27: 1405-12.
Lindholm AK, Thomas RJ. Differences between populations of reed warblers in defences against brood parasitism. Behaviour. 2000;137: 25-42.
Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol. 1992;3: 128-32.
Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim Behav. 1995;49: 1185-209.
Lyon B. Mechanism of egg recognition in defenses against conspecific brood parasitism: American coots (Fulica americana) know their own eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2007;61: 455-63.
Ma L, Yang C, Liang W. Hawk mimicry does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts. Avian Res. 2018a;9: 35.
Ma L, Yang C, Liu J, Zhang J, Liang W, Møller AP. Costs of breeding far away from neighbors: Isolated host nests are more vulnerable to cuckoo parasitism. Behav Proc. 2018b;157: 327-32.
Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT. Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk. 1991a;108: 348-54.
Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Lampe HM. Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour. 1991b;116: 64-89.
Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol. 1988;63: 167-87.
Moskát C, Hauber ME. Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn. 2007;10: 377-86.
Moskát C, Szentpéteri J, Barta Z. Adaptations by great reed warblers to brood parasitism: A comparison of populations in sympatry and allopatry with the common cuckoo. Behaviour. 2002;139: 1313-29.
Moskát C, Hansson B, Barabás L, Bártol I, Karcza Z. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism, antiparasite defence and gene flow in closely located populations of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol. 2008;39: 663-71.
Moskát C, Bán M, Székely T, Komdeur J, Lucassen RW, van Boheemen LA, et al. Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites. J Exp Biol. 2010;213: 1976-83.
Moskát C, Takasu F, Munoz AR, Nakamura H, Bán M, Barta Z. Cuckoo parasitism on two closely-related Acrocephalus warblers in distant areas: A case of parallel coevolution. Chin Birds. 2012;3: 320-9.
Moskát C, Zölei A, Bán M, Elek Z, Tong L, Geltsch N, et al. How to spot a stranger's egg? A mimicry-specific discordancy effect in the recognition of parasitic eggs. Ethology. 2014;120: 616-26.
Payne RB. The ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1977;8: 1-28.
Peer BD, Rothstein SI, Delaney KS, Fleischer RC. Defence behaviour against brood parasitism is deeply rooted in mainland and island scrub-jays. Anim Behav. 2007;73: 55-63.
Peer BD, Kuehn MJ, Rothstein SI, Fleischer RC. Persistence of host defence behaviour in the absence of avian brood parasitism. Biol Lett. 2011;7: 670-3.
Požgayová M, Procházka P, Honza M. Sex-specific defence behaviour against brood parasitism in a host with female-only incubation. Behav Proc. 2009;81: 34-8.
Rensch B. Verhalten von SingvöelnbeiÄderung des Geleges. Ornithol Monatsber. 1925;33: 169-73.
Roncalli G, Ibáñez-Álamo D, Soler M. Size and material of model parasitic eggs affect the rejection response of western Bonelli's warbler Phylloscopus bonelli. Ibis. 2017;159: 113-23.
Rothstein SI. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: Possible learned and innate factors. Auk. 1974;91: 796-807.
Rothstein SI. Mechanism of egg recognition: Do birds know their own eggs? Anim Behav. 1975;23: 268-78.
Soler M. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev. 2014;89: 688-704.
Soler M, Fernández-Morante J, Espinosa F, Martín-Vivaldi M. Pecking but accepting the parasitic eggs may not reflect ejection failure: the role of motivation. Ethology. 2012;118: 662-72.
Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Roncalli G, Ibáñez-Álamo JD. Relationships between egg-recognition and egg-ejection in a grasp-ejector species. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0166283.
Stokke BG, Rudolfsen G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology. 2004;110: 459-70.
Trnka A, Prokop P. Does social mating system influence nest defence behaviour in great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) males? Ethology. 2010;116: 1075-83.
Trnka A, Požgayová M, Samaš P, Honza M. Repeatability of host female and male aggression towards a brood parasite. Ethology. 2013;119: 907-17.
Wang L, Yang C, Møller AP, Liang W, Lu X. Multiple mechanisms of egg recognition in a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69: 1761-7.
Wang L, Yang C, He G, Liang W, Møller AP. Cuckoos use host egg number to choose host nests for parasitism. Proc R Soc B. 2020;287: 20200343.
Wang L, He G, Zhang Y, Ma J, Liang W. Cryptic eggs are rejected less frequently by a cuckoo host. Anim Cogn. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01507-2.
Yang C, Li D, Wang L, Liang G, Zhang Z, Liang W. Geographic variation in parasitism rates of two sympatric cuckoo hosts in China. Zool Res. 2014a;35: 67-71.
Yang C, Liu Y, Zeng L, Liang W. Egg color variation, but not egg rejection behavior, changes in a cuckoo host breeding in the absence of brood parasitism. Ecol Evol. 2014b;4: 2239-46.
Yang C, Møller AP, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Liang W, Stokkle BG. Reject the odd egg: egg recognition mechanisms in parrotbills. Behav Ecol. 2014c;25: 1320-4.
Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav. 2016;122: 177-81.
Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. How cuckoos find and choose host nests for parasitism. Behav Ecol. 2017;28: 859-65.
Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. High egg rejection rate in a Chinese population of grey-backed thrush (Turdus hortulorum). Zool Res. 2019;40: 226-30.
Yang C, Wang L, Cheng S-J, Hsu Y-C, Møller AP, Liang W. Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed. Front Zool. 2020;17: 14.
Yang C, Huang J, Liang W, Møller AP. Absence of anti-parasitic defenses in an Asian population of the magpie, a regular host of the great spotted cuckoo in Europe. Curr Zool. 2021;67: 345-7.
Yi T, Sun YH, Liang W. Egg rejection and egg recognition mechanism of chestnut thrushes (Turdus rubrocanus). Behav Proc. 2020;178: 104158.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
We thank the Forestry Bureau of Yongnian County, Hebei Province, China, for permission to undertake this study. We are grateful to Canchao Yang and Jianping Liu for help with statistical analyses, Xiaodong Rao and Jianwei Zhang for assistance with fieldwork.
Rights and permissions
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
FEEDBACK 
TOP