Open Access
Issue
Published:
08 December 2020
Assessing site-safeguard effectiveness and habitat preferences of Bar-headed Geese (Anser indicus) at their stopover sites within theQinghai-Tibet Plateau using GPS/GSM telemetry
),
Download citation
479
Views
10
Downloads
5
Crossref
N/A
WoS
8
Scopus
0
CSCD
The Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus) breeds across the high plains and plateau of Central Asia and winters in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau and the Indian sub-continent. Of the two recognized discrete flyways of the Bar-headed Goose, the Eastern Tibetan Flyway (ETF) is the larger, comprising at least six migration routes. However, we remain ignorant about their migratory connectivity, habitat use and effectiveness of site-safeguard mechanisms set in place for the species.
We tracked 30 ETF Bar-headed Geese from Chinese and Mongolian breeding areas to their wintering grounds using GPS/GSM transmitters, to determine their migration routes and stopover staging patterns within the QTP, overlaying these upon GIS layers of protected area status and habitat type, to model their habitat selection.
In total, 14 tagged Bar-headed Geese provided information on their entire autumn migration and 4 geese on their entire spring migration. Qinghai Lake marked birds overwintered in the QTP (n = 2), geese tagged in Mongolia wintered either in the QTP (n = 3) or in India/Bangladesh (n = 9), representing three of the migration routes within the ETF. In total, tagged birds staged at 79 different stopover sites within QTP in autumn and 23 in spring, of which 65% (autumn) and 59% (spring) of all fixes fell within the boundaries of either National Nature Reserves (NNRs) or Important Birds Areas (IBAs) inthe QTP. Bar-headed Geese predominantly occurred on four land-cover types: grassland (mostly by day), water bodies (at night), wetlands and bare substrates (salt flats, dry lake/river substrates and plough) with little change in proportion. Generalized linear mixed models comparing presence with pseudo-absence data suggested geese strongly selected for wetlands as staging habitat, avoiding bare substrates in spring.
Based on our limited observations of these tagged geese, this study is the first to show that the current designated National Nature Reserves in place in the staging areas within theQTP appear adequate to protect this increasing population. In addition, Hala Lake in Qinghai Province and adjacent areas used as initial QTP staging during autumn migration (currently outside of designated as NNRs/IBAs) are recommended for protection, based on their use by tagged birds from this study. Habitat modelling confirmed the importance of natural wetlands as feeding areas and safe areas of open water as roosting places.
menu
Assessing site-safeguard effectiveness and habitat preferences of Bar-headed Geese (Anser indicus) at their stopover sites within theQinghai-Tibet Plateau using GPS/GSM telemetry
),
Abstract
The Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus) breeds across the high plains and plateau of Central Asia and winters in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau and the Indian sub-continent. Of the two recognized discrete flyways of the Bar-headed Goose, the Eastern Tibetan Flyway (ETF) is the larger, comprising at least six migration routes. However, we remain ignorant about their migratory connectivity, habitat use and effectiveness of site-safeguard mechanisms set in place for the species.
We tracked 30 ETF Bar-headed Geese from Chinese and Mongolian breeding areas to their wintering grounds using GPS/GSM transmitters, to determine their migration routes and stopover staging patterns within the QTP, overlaying these upon GIS layers of protected area status and habitat type, to model their habitat selection.
In total, 14 tagged Bar-headed Geese provided information on their entire autumn migration and 4 geese on their entire spring migration. Qinghai Lake marked birds overwintered in the QTP (n = 2), geese tagged in Mongolia wintered either in the QTP (n = 3) or in India/Bangladesh (n = 9), representing three of the migration routes within the ETF. In total, tagged birds staged at 79 different stopover sites within QTP in autumn and 23 in spring, of which 65% (autumn) and 59% (spring) of all fixes fell within the boundaries of either National Nature Reserves (NNRs) or Important Birds Areas (IBAs) inthe QTP. Bar-headed Geese predominantly occurred on four land-cover types: grassland (mostly by day), water bodies (at night), wetlands and bare substrates (salt flats, dry lake/river substrates and plough) with little change in proportion. Generalized linear mixed models comparing presence with pseudo-absence data suggested geese strongly selected for wetlands as staging habitat, avoiding bare substrates in spring.
Based on our limited observations of these tagged geese, this study is the first to show that the current designated National Nature Reserves in place in the staging areas within theQTP appear adequate to protect this increasing population. In addition, Hala Lake in Qinghai Province and adjacent areas used as initial QTP staging during autumn migration (currently outside of designated as NNRs/IBAs) are recommended for protection, based on their use by tagged birds from this study. Habitat modelling confirmed the importance of natural wetlands as feeding areas and safe areas of open water as roosting places.
References(69)
Batbayar N, Takekawa JY, Natsagdorj T, Spragens KA, Xiao X. Site selection and nest survival of the Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus) on the Mongolian Plateau. Waterbirds. 2014; 37: 381–93.
Bishop CM, Spivey RJ, Hawkes LA, Batbayar N, Chua B, Frappell PB, et al. The roller coaster flight strategy of bar-headed geese conserves energy during Himalayan migrations. Science. 2015; 347: 250–4.
Bishop MA, Tsamchu D. Tibet Autonomous region january 2007 survey for Black-necked crane, Common crane, and Bar-headed goose. China Crane News. 2007; 11: 24–6.
Bishop MA, Yanling S, Zhouma C, Binyuan G. Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus wintering in south-central Tibet. Wildfowl. 1997; 48: 118–26.
Bodey TW, Cleasby IR, Bell F, Parr N, Schultz A, Votier SC, et al. A phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis of biologging device effects on birds: deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018; 9: 946–55.
Bourouiba L, Wu J, Newman S, Takekawa J, Natdorj T, Batbayar N, et al. Spatial dynamics of bar-headed geese migration in the context of H5N1. J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7: 1627–39.
Chen H, Li Y, Li Z, Shi J, Shinya K, Deng G, et al. Properties and dissemination of H5N1 viruses isolated during an influenza outbreak in migratory waterfowl in western China. J Virol. 2006; 80: 5976–83.
Chen W, Doko T, Fujita G, Hijikata N, Tokita K-I, Uchida K, et al. Migration of tundra swans (Cygnus columbianus) wintering in Japan using satellite tracking: identification of the Eastern Palearctic flyway. Zool Sci. 2016; 33: 63–72.
Cong P, Wang X, Cao L, Fox AD. Within-winter shifts in Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus distribution at East Dongting Lake, China. Ardea. 2012; 100: 5–11.
Cui P, Hou Y, Tang M, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Yin Z, et al. Movement patterns of Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus during breeding and post-breeding periods at Qinghai Lake, China. J Ornithol. 2011; 152: 83–92.
Fox AD, Abraham KF. Why geese benefit from the transition from natural vegetation to agriculture. Ambio. 2017; 46: 188–97.
Gong P, Liu H, Zhang M, Li C, Wang J, Huang H, et al. Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017. Sci Bull. 2019; 64: 370–3.
Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Liang L, et al. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int J Remote Sens. 2013; 34: 2607–54.
Hao M, Zhang Y, Lei F, Yan B, Xing Z. Potential habitat analysis of Anser indicus with digital elevation model. Chin J Zool. 2010; 45: 35–42 (In Chinese).
Hawkes LA, Balachandran S, Batbayar N, Butler PJ, Frappell PB, Milsom WK, et al. The trans-Himalayan flights of bar-headed geese (Anser indicus). P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 9516–9.
Hawkes LA, Balachandran S, Batbayar N, Butler PJ, Chua B, Douglas DC, et al. The paradox of extreme high-altitude migration in bar-headed geese Anser indicus. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2013; 280: 20122114.
Jones J. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk. 2001; 118: 557–62.
Kölzsch A, Müskens GJ, Kruckenberg H, Glazov P, Weinzierl R, Nolet BA, et al. Towards a new understanding of migration timing: slower spring than autumn migration in geese reflects different decision rules for stopover use and departure. Oikos. 2016; 125: 1496–507.
Köppen U, Yakovlev AP, Barth R, Kaatz M, Berthold P. Seasonal migrations of four individual bar-headed geese Anser indicus from Kyrgyzstan followed by satellite telemetry. J Ornithol. 2010; 151: 703–12.
Li F, Bishop MA, Drolma T. Power line strikes by black-necked cranes and bar-headed geese in Tibet Autonomous Region. Chin Birds. 2011; 2: 167–73.
Li X, Wang X, Fang L, Batbayar N, Natsagdorj T, Davaasuren B, et al. Annual migratory patterns of Mongolian-Manchurian Eastern Greylag Geese (Anser anser rubrirostris) revealed by GPS/GSM loggers. Integr Zool. 2020; 15: 213–23.
Liu D, Zhang G, Li F, Ma T, Lu J, Qian F. A revised species population estimate for the Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus). Avian Res. 2017; 8: 7.
Liu D, Zhang G, Jiang H, Shan K, Hou Y-Q, Dai M, et al. Movement and habitat utilization of breeding Bar-headed Goose and the relationship with humans in Qinghai Lake. Acta Ecol Sin. 2008; 28: 5201–8 (In Chinese).
Liu D, Zhang G, Qian F, Hou Y, Dai M, Jiang H, et al. Population, distribution and home range of wintering bar-headed goose along Yarlung Zangbo River, & nbsp; Tibet. Acta Ecol Sin. 2010; 30: 4173–9 (In Chinese).
Middleton BA. Habitat and food preferences of Greylag and Barheaded Geese wintering in the Keoladeo National Park. India J Trop Ecol. 1992; 8: 181–93.
Middleton BA, Van der Valk AG. The food habits of Greylag and Barheaded Geese in the Keoladeo National Park. India Wildfowl. 1987; 38: 94–102.
Newman SH, Hill NJ, Spragens KA, Janies D, Voronkin IO, Prosser DJ, et al. Eco-virological approach for assessing the role of wild birds in the spread of avian influenza H5N1 along the Central Asian Flyway. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e30636.
Northrup JM, Hooten MB, Anderson CR Jr, Wittemyer G. Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology. 2013; 94: 1456–63.
Page GW, Warnock N, Tibbitts TL, Jorgensen D, Hartman CA, Stenzel LE. Annual migratory patterns of Long-billed Curlews in the American West. Condor. 2014; 116: 50–61.
Pekel J-F, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward AS. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature. 2016; 540: 418–22.
Prins HHT, van Wieren SE. Number, population structure and habitat use of bar-headed geese Anser indicus in Ladakh (India) during the brood-rearing period. Acta Zool Sin. 2004; 50: 738–44.
Prosser DJ, Takekawa JY, Newman SH, Yan B, Douglas DC, Hou Y, et al. Satellite-marked waterfowl reveal migratory connection between H5N1 outbreak areas in China and Mongolia. Ibis. 2009; 151: 568–76.
Prosser DJ, Cui P, Takekawa JY, Tang M, Hou Y, Collins BM, et al. Wild bird migration across the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: a transmission route for highly pathogenic H5N1. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e17622.
Signer J, Fieberg J, Avgar T. Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9: 880–90.
Takekawa J, Heath SR, Douglas DC, Perry WM, Javed S, Newman SH, et al. Geographic variation in Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus: connectivity of wintering areas and breeding grounds across a broad front. Wildfowl. 2009; 59: 100–23.
Tian H, Zhou S, Dong L, Van Boeckel TP, Cui Y, Wu Y, et al. Avian influenza H5N1 viral and bird migration networks in Asia. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 172–7.
Van der Ven J, Gole P, Ouweneel G. Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus: Notes from breeding and wintering areas. Goose Bull. 2010; 10: 7–17.
Wang X, Fox AD, Cong PH, Cao L. Food constraints explain the restricted distribution of wintering Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in China. Ibis. 2013; 155: 576–92.
Xu W, Fan X, Ma J, Pimm SL, Kong L, Zeng Y, et al. Hidden loss of wetlands in China. Curr Biol. 2019; 29: 3065–71.
Xu Y, Si Y, Takekawa J, Liu Q, Prins HHT, Yin S, et al. A network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds. Conserv Biol. 2020; 34: 416–26.
Yan L, Hu M, Meng F, Liu N. Foraging habitat selection of Anser indicus during winter at Lashihai Lake in Yunnan Province. Mod Agr Sci Tech. 2014; 10: 164 (In Chinese).
Yang F, Zhang YQ. Quantities and distribution of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) and other large waterfowl on the Yunnan and Guizhou Plateau. Zool Res. 2014; 35: 80–4.
Yang Y, Zhang G, Lu J, Liu W, Li Z. Diurnal activity patterns and environmental factors on behaviors of Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus wintering at Caohai Lake of Guizhou, China. Acta Ecol Sin. 2012; 32: 7280–8 (In Chinese).
Yang Y, Zhang G, Lu J, Liu W, Li Z. Foraging habitat selection of Bar-headed Goose in winter at Caohai National Reserve in Guizhou. Sci Silvae Sin. 2013; 49: 176–80 (In Chinese).
Zhang G, Liu D, Qian F, Hou Y, Chen L, Dai Q, et al. The water bird community and home range of the bar-headed goose at Yamdrok Lake in Tibet, China. Acta Ecol Sin. 2016; 36: 946–52 (In Chinese).
Zheng R, Smith LM, Prosser DJ, Takekawa JY, Newman SH, Sullivan JD, et al. Investigating home range, movement pattern, and habitat selection of Bar-headed Geese during breeding season at Qinghai Lake, China. Animals. 2018; 8: 182.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Xin Wang and Xianghuang Li for their help on data analysis, and Ming Ma for his help on the Bar-headed Goose distribution in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. We are also indebted to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that greatly improve the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
FEEDBACK 
TOP