Journal Home > Volume 8 , Issue 1
Background

Avian brood parasitism is a breeding strategy in which brood parasites lay their eggs in the nest of other species. This behavior is closely related to aspects of the biological evolution of the parasitic species such as reduced female body size and plumage color polymorphism. However, not much is known whether it is associated with the evolution of vocalization.

Methods

We collected samples of the typical male calls of 67 species belonging to the sub‑family Cuculinae. Using the calls, we measured five acoustic parameters for each samples to test the differences in vocal structures between parasitic and nonparasitic species. To control for potential phylogenetic effects, we also performed phylogenetic independent contrast analyses.

Results

We found that vocal structures were relatively similar among the parasitic species with a tendency to simple and low-frequency calls. In addition, harmonic structures were observed more frequently in the nonparasitic group.

Conclusions

Overall, these results support the idea that brood parasitic behavior with associated ecological condi tions may play a role in vocal evolution, a better understanding of which may greatly improve our knowledge of vocal diversification in non-oscine birds.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Comparing vocal structures of the parasitic and nonparasitic groups in Cuculinae

Show Author's information Heeyoung KimJin-Won LeeJeong-Chil Yoo
Korea Institute of Ornithology and Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background

Avian brood parasitism is a breeding strategy in which brood parasites lay their eggs in the nest of other species. This behavior is closely related to aspects of the biological evolution of the parasitic species such as reduced female body size and plumage color polymorphism. However, not much is known whether it is associated with the evolution of vocalization.

Methods

We collected samples of the typical male calls of 67 species belonging to the sub‑family Cuculinae. Using the calls, we measured five acoustic parameters for each samples to test the differences in vocal structures between parasitic and nonparasitic species. To control for potential phylogenetic effects, we also performed phylogenetic independent contrast analyses.

Results

We found that vocal structures were relatively similar among the parasitic species with a tendency to simple and low-frequency calls. In addition, harmonic structures were observed more frequently in the nonparasitic group.

Conclusions

Overall, these results support the idea that brood parasitic behavior with associated ecological condi tions may play a role in vocal evolution, a better understanding of which may greatly improve our knowledge of vocal diversification in non-oscine birds.

Keywords: Brood parasitism, Cuculinae, Non-oscine bird, Vocal evolution

References(20)

Bertelli S, Tubaro PL. Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds. Biol J Linn Soc. 2002;77:423–30.

Brumm H. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J Anim Ecol. 2004;73:434–40.

Charif R, Strickman LM, Waack AM. Raven Pro 1.4 user's manual. New York: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2010.
Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Raven: interactive sound analysis software. Version 1.4. New York: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2010. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/brp/Raven/Raven.html/.
Davies NB. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T. & A.D. Poyser; 2000.
Erritzøe J, Mann CF, Brammer FP, Fuller RA. Cuckoos of the world. London: Christopher Helm; 2012.

Fraga RM. Phylogeny and behavioral evolution in the family Icteridae. Ornitol Neotrop. 2008;19:61–71.

Fuisz TI, de Kort SR. Habitat-dependent call divergence in the common cuckoo: Is it a potential signal for assortative mating? Proc R Soc B. 2007;274:2093–7.

Jetz W, Thomas G, Joy J, Hartmann K, Mooers A. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature. 2012;491:444–8.

Kim H, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C. Characteristics of female calls of four Cuculus species breeding in Korea. Kor J Ornithol. 2017;24:41–7.

Krüger O, Davies NB. The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:375–81.

McCracken KG, Sheldon FH. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3833–6.

Medina I, Langmore NE. Coevolution is linked with phenotypic diversification but not speciation in avian brood parasites. Proc R Soc B. 2015;282:20152056.

Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S, Isaac N, Pearse W. Caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. Vienna: Comprehensive R Archive Network; 2013. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=caper/.
Payne RB, Sorenson MD. The cuckoos. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing; 2011. http://www.Rproject.org/.

Rubolini D, Liker A, Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP, Saino N. Using the BirdTree.org website to obtain robust phylogenies for avian comparative studies: a primer. Curr Zool. 2015;61:959–65.

Sorenson MD, Sefc KM, Payne RB. Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds. Nature. 2003;424:928–31.

Stoddard MC, Stevens M. Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo. Evolution. 2011;65:2004–13.

York JE, Davies NB. Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defences towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1520–5.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 29 August 2017
Accepted: 09 October 2017
Published: 17 October 2017
Issue date: January 2017

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the people who recorded bird songs in the field and shared those through online repositories. We also thanks to Hye-Kyoung Moon for phylogenetic advice, and Hee-Jin Noh, Kyung-Hoe Kim, Ha-Na Yoo, Sung-Ho Yoon, Hae-Ni Kim, and So-Hyeon Yoo for constructive discussions about the idea of this study.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return