AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Organic geochemical characteristics and exploration significance of the Upper Ordovician Qrebake Formation source rocks, Shunbei area, Tarim Basin

Shuai HE1,2,3Anlai MA1( )Lu YUN4Zicheng CAO4Xianqing LI2,3Cheng HUANG4Guosong ZHANG1Song HU1Tieyi WANG1Weilong PENG1Zhili ZHU1Futian CUI1,2,3
Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 102260, China
State Key Laboratory for Fine Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Northwest Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Source rocks in the Upper Ordovician Qrebake Formation in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin have been newly discovered in recent exploration. Investigating their geochemical characteristics holds great significance for future hydrocarbon exploration. Using comprehensive geochemical experiments, analyses, and tests on source rock samples from six wells in the Shunbei area, we explore their organic matter abundance, types, and thermal maturity in the Upper Ordovician Qrebake Formation. The results indicate that the selected source rocks consist primarily of grayish-black mudstones, dark gray calcareous mudstones, and dark gray argillaceous limestones. The grayish-black mudstones, among others, exhibit total organic carbon (TOC) content ranging from 0.20 % to 2.81 % (average: 1.59 %) and Rock-Eval pyrolysis-based hydrocarbon generative potential (S1+S2) from 0.43 to 12.05 mg/g (average: 5.59 mg/g). The dark gray calcareous mudstones show TOC content varying from 0.46 % to 2.24 % (average: 1.47 %) and S1+S2 from 0.18 to 1.97 mg/g (average: 0.91 mg/g). In contrast, the dark gray argillaceous limestones manifest TOC content ranging from 0.22 % to 3.41 % (average: 1.72 %) and S1+S2 from 1.37 to 18.56 mg/g (average: 9.04 mg/g). Notably, wells SB5, SB7, and SB71X present source rocks of the highest organic matter abundance. Source rocks in the Qrebake Formation are formed in a weakly reducing, brackish marine sedimentary environment, with parent materials originating primarily from low aquatic algae. Most samples exhibit hydrogen index (HI) values ranging between 289 and 512 mg/g (average: 416 mg/g), suggesting humic-sapropelic organic matter (Type Ⅱ1) with high hydrocarbon generative potential. Source rocks from well SB7 present vitrinite equivalent reflectance (Ro,eq) ranging from 0.55 % to 0.88 % (average: 0.72 %), indicating low-to-moderate maturity. In well SB71X, the Ro,eq ranges from 0.53 % to 0.70 % (average: 0.62 %), suggesting low-maturity source rocks. Meanwhile, source rocks from well SB5 display Ro,eq between 0.85 % and 0.95 % (average: 0.90 %) of moderate maturity. Source rocks in the formation measure from 20 to 25 m in thickness, distributed primarily in the intra-platform depressions in the Nos. 5 and 7 fault zones in the Shunbei area.

CLC number: TE122.1 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-9985(2025)01-0246-15

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oil & Gas Geology
Pages 246-260

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
HE S, MA A, YUN L, et al. Organic geochemical characteristics and exploration significance of the Upper Ordovician Qrebake Formation source rocks, Shunbei area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(1): 246-260. https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20250117

807

Views

13

Downloads

0

Crossref

5

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 22 October 2024
Revised: 27 December 2024
Published: 28 February 2025
© 2025 Oil & Gas Geology