AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Hyperpycnal flow deposits of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag and its peripheries, Junggar Basin

Xuan CHEN1,2( )Xin TAO1,2Jianhua TAN3Changfu XU3Yingyan LI3Yuan DENG3Yang GAO4Taiju YIN1,2
Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC (China) Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The sedimentary origin of the Permian Lucaogou Formation reservoirs in the Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin has long been a controversial topic. Based on data from outcrop and core observations, logging, and seismic surveys, as well as lab tests of the Lucaogou Formation, we conduct sedimentary analysis, obtaining the following results: (1) The reservoirs of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the study area are of siltstone/fine-grained sandstone and argillaceous siltstone. They feature well-developed paired graded bedding sequences with internal erosion surfaces, massive bedding, and terrestrial plant fragments, which can be an interpretation of a sedimentary origin of lacustrine hyperpycnal flows; (2) The channel subfacies of hyperpycnal flow deposits consists primarily of massive- and cross-bedding siltstone/fine-grained sandstone, with a single-layer thickness of 0.8~2.8 m, averaging 1.6 m and NMR-derived porosity of 6%~12%, averaging 9.5%. In contrast, the lobe subfacies of hyperpycnal flow deposits predominantly comprises siltstones showing graded bedding and climbing-ripple bedding, with a single-layer thickness of 0.5~1.4 m, averaging 0.9 m and NMR-derived porosity of 3.5%~7.8%, averaging 5.2%; (3) The channel subfacies showing seismic reflections featuring lensoid filling presents a stacking pattern of aggradation with thick laminated accretionary fillings that are in the shape of bands or tongues on the plane, with a lateral width of 1~3 km. In contrast, the lobe subfacies displays draping seismic reflections, the sand bodies of which are of thinly laminated lateral-accretion and progradational bedding in the shape of fan on the plane, with both length and width exceeding 10 km; (4) During the deposition of the Lucaogou Formation, terrigenous clastics and organic matter, carried by frequent flood-induced hyperpycnal flows in the mountainous area of the southern Jimusaer Sag, were rapidly deposited in the sag, forming sandstone reservoirs and high-quality source rocks, and leading to the extensive contact and frequent alternation between the sand bodies of channel and lobe subfacies and the source rocks of hyperpycnal flow deposits of marginal and deep lacustrine facies. Such a sedimentary pattern of lacustrine hyperpycnal flows characterized by the coexistence of coarse-and fine-grained sandstones and paragenetic source rock-reservoir sequences, provides a novel sedimentary interpretation on the origin of high-quality shale oil reservoirs in the Jimusaer Sag.

CLC number: TE121.3 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-9985(2023)06-1530-16

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oil & Gas Geology
Pages 1530-1545

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN X, TAO X, TAN J, et al. Hyperpycnal flow deposits of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag and its peripheries, Junggar Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1530-1545. https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20230615

382

Views

8

Downloads

0

Crossref

8

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 10 May 2023
Revised: 16 October 2023
Published: 28 December 2023
© 2023 Oil & Gas Geology