AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Mechanisms for lacustrine shale oil enrichment in Chinese sedimentary basins

Xusheng GUO1,2( )Xiaoxiao MA1,2Maowen LI1,2Menhui QIAN1,2Zongquan HU1,2
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China
Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 102206, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

By analyzing the tectonic and sedimentary environments for the formation of organic-rich shales in China’s continental lacustrine basins, we identify significant differences in the development of high-quality continental source rocks across various types of lacustrine basins. For shale sequences deposited in fresh-water lacustrine basins, the main lithofacies are felsic and clayey shales, as observed from the 1st member of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation (K2qn1 section) in the Songliao Basin and the 7th member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation (T3yc7 section) in the Ordos Basin. For shale sequences developed in a saline lacustrine environment, however, carbonates and evaporites are dominant lithofacies, as represented by the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Jiyang Depression. There are three types of lithofacies assemblages for Chinese lacustrine shales, that is, the shale interbedded/intercalated with sand, mixed shale, and clayey shale. These lithofacies assemblages determine the hydrocarbon source-reservoir coupling characteristics, differential evolution of hydrocarbon generation, and property differences of in-situ fluids in the lacustrine organic-rich shales. The shale interbedded/intercalated with sand assemblage is characterized by source-reservoir separation and near-source migration. The mixed shale assemblage shows macroscopic integration and microscopic separation between source rock and reservoir. In contrast, the clayey shale acts as both the source and reservoir of in-situ generated hydrocarbons, featuring pervasive oil distribution. As revealed by evidence, inorganic pores provide the most favorable storage space for lacustrine shale oil in medium-low maturity, and form effective pore-fracture networks for hydrocarbon transport together with multi-type and multi-scale microfractures. Self-sealing capacity of shale is conducive to the in-situ or proximal preservation of shale oil and gas. Comparison of typical continental shale sequences in the Chinese sedimentary basins indicates that favorable source-reservoir coupling, suitable thermal maturity level, and self-sealing capacity of shale are the major controls for oil enrichment in lacustrine shale. This study also presents a preliminary model for differential enrichment of lacustrine shale oil in China. Therefore, the laminated shales in medium-low maturity in gentle slope zones and the clayey shale-rich strata in medium-high maturity in deep sags should be prioritized in lacustrine shale oil exploration in downfaulted lacustrine basins. Moreover, both the shale interbedded/intercalated with sand and the clayey shale in medium-high maturity are crucial to making breakthroughs in lacustrine shale oil exploration therein.

CLC number: TE122.1 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-9985(2023)06-1333-17

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oil & Gas Geology
Pages 1333-1349

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
GUO X, MA X, LI M, et al. Mechanisms for lacustrine shale oil enrichment in Chinese sedimentary basins. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1333-1349. https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20230601

1102

Views

29

Downloads

0

Crossref

115

Scopus

83

CSCD

Received: 07 March 2023
Revised: 28 August 2023
Published: 28 December 2023
© 2023 Oil & Gas Geology