AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper

Design and Experimental Attitude Control of Quadrotor Via Optimized Adaptive IT-2 FLC Integrated with Nonlinear FOPID

Qiyuan Wang*( )Caiping ZhaoYanchun Liu( )Hongxue QuXuejun Feng§
School of Computer Science, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100101, P. R. China
C-EPRI Electric Power Engineering Co. Ltd., Nari Group Corporation, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Shandong College of Electronic Technology, Jinan 250200, Shandong, P. R. China
Inspur Communication Information Systems Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, Shandong, P. R. China

This paper was recommended for publication in its revised form by editorial board member, Wen-Hua Chen.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller (IT2-FLC) integrated with a nonlinear Fractional-Order Proportional Integral-Derivative (FOPID) controller for quadrotor attitude control. The adaptive mechanism, based on sliding surfaces, tunes the controller parameters in real-time. Moreover, the fuzzy system is integrated with a nonlinear FOPID controller. Unlike the fixed gains of the conventional FOPID, the nonlinear variant dynamically adjusts its parameters in real-time. The Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) is used to optimize both controller and fuzzy system parameters, minimizing the Integral of the Absolute Error (IAE). To validate the effectiveness of the proposed controller, three configurations — IT2-FLC integrated with FOPID, adaptive IT2-FLC integrated with FOPID and IT2-FLC integrated with nonlinear FOPID — are designed for the attitude control of a quadrotor, all aiming to achieve the same objective function. The results show that nonlinear gain alone improves performance more than the adaptive structure alone in all axes. For the roll axis, nonlinear gain reduces IAE and RMSE by 55.08% and 40.80%, respectively, while the adaptive structure achieves smaller improvements of 34.62% and 17.24%. In the pitch axis, nonlinear gain reduces IAE and RMSE by 37.36% and 18.10%, compared to 30.27% and 8.45% with the adaptive structure. Combining nonlinear gain with the adaptive structure leads to the best performance in all cases, with the largest improvements in IAE, MAE and RMSE observed in the roll and yaw axes.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Unmanned Systems
Pages 441-459

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang Q, Zhao C, Liu Y, et al. Design and Experimental Attitude Control of Quadrotor Via Optimized Adaptive IT-2 FLC Integrated with Nonlinear FOPID. Unmanned Systems, 2026, 14(2): 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S230138502650010X

141

Views

1

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 21 September 2024
Accepted: 19 January 2025
Published: 20 June 2025
© World Scientific Publishing Company