AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (784.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Analysis of Outage Capacity of NOMA: SIC vs. JD

Shuang ChenKewu PengHuangpin JinJian Song( )
Research Institute of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering Department, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Show Author Information

Abstract

In fifth-generation wireless communication networks, Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) has attracted much attention in both academic and industrial fields because of its higher spectral efficiency in comparison with orthogonal multiple access. Recently, numerous uplink NOMA techniques have been proposed, some of which are based on Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) and others on Joint Decoding (JD, or simultaneous decoding). In this study, we analyze the outage capacities of SIC and JD in the case of single-block transmission over a two-user Gaussian multiple-access channel with partial channel state information at transmitter from the perspective of information theory. Results of the analysis and numerals show that compared to SIC, JD can achieve a sum-rate gain of up to 10% or sum-power gain of 0.8 dB.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 538-543

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Chen S, Peng K, Jin H, et al. Analysis of Outage Capacity of NOMA: SIC vs. JD. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2016, 21(5): 538-543. https://doi.org/10.1109/TST.2016.7590322

1347

Views

90

Downloads

8

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

8

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 29 June 2015
Revised: 17 December 2015
Accepted: 25 December 2015
Published: 18 October 2016
© The author(s) 2016