Journal Home > Volume 18 , Issue 4

With the development of the social media and Internet, discovering latent information from massive information is becoming particularly relevant to improving user experience. Research efforts based on preferences and relationships between users have attracted more and more attention. Predictive problems, such as inferring friend relationship and co-author relationship between users have been explored. However, many such methods are based on analyzing either node features or the network structures separately, few have tried to tackle both of them at the same time. In this paper, in order to discover latent co-interests’ relationship, we not only consider users’ attributes but network information as well. In addition, we propose an Interest-based Factor Graph Model (I-FGM) to incorporate these factors. Experiments on two data sets (bookmarking and music network) demonstrate that this predictive method can achieve better results than the other three methods (ANN, NB, and SVM).


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Latent Co-interests’ Relationship Prediction

Show Author's information Feng TanLi Li( )Zheyu ZhangYunlong Guo
Department of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Abstract

With the development of the social media and Internet, discovering latent information from massive information is becoming particularly relevant to improving user experience. Research efforts based on preferences and relationships between users have attracted more and more attention. Predictive problems, such as inferring friend relationship and co-author relationship between users have been explored. However, many such methods are based on analyzing either node features or the network structures separately, few have tried to tackle both of them at the same time. In this paper, in order to discover latent co-interests’ relationship, we not only consider users’ attributes but network information as well. In addition, we propose an Interest-based Factor Graph Model (I-FGM) to incorporate these factors. Experiments on two data sets (bookmarking and music network) demonstrate that this predictive method can achieve better results than the other three methods (ANN, NB, and SVM).

Keywords: social network, linking prediction, node similarity, factor graph model

References(29)

[1]
M. McPherson, L. S. Lovin, and J. M. Cook, Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 415-444, Aug. 2001.
[2]
G. Salton and M. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, New York, USA, 1986.
[3]
E. Leicht, P. Holme, and M. Newman, Vertex similarity in networks, Physical Review, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 1-10, Jun. 2006.
[4]
E. Ravasz, A. Somera, D. Mongru, Z. Oltvai, and A. Barabasi, Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks, Science, vol. 297, no. 5586, pp. 1551-1555, Aug. 2002.
[5]
S. Brin and L. Page, The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 107-117, Sep. 1998.
[6]
H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J. Pan, Fast random walk with restart and its applications, in Proc. 6th International Conference on Data Mining, Washington DC, USA, 2006, pp. 613-622.
DOI
[7]
G. Jeh and J. Wido, SimRank: A measure of structural-context similarity, in Proc. of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, 2002, pp. 271-279.
DOI
[8]
C. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, New York, USA: Springer, 2006.
[9]
N. Friedman, L. Getoor, D. Koller, and A. Pfeffer, Learning probabilistic relational models, in Proc. 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sweden, 1999, pp. 1300-1309.
[10]
Y. Z. Guo, K. Ramamohanarao, and L. A. F. Park, Web page prediction based on conditional random fields, ECAI, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2008, pp. 251-255.
[11]
Z. Wei and H. Z. Li, A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data, Mathematics and Physical Sciences Bioinformatics, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1537-1544, Sep. 2007.
[12]
J. Tang, M. C. Hong, J. Z. Li, and B. Y. Liang, Tree-structured conditional random fields for semantic annotation, in Proc. 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Busan, Korea, 2006, pp. 640-653.
DOI
[13]
W. Tang, H. Zhuang, and J. Tang, Learning to infer social ties in large networks, in Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Berlin, Germany, 2011, pp. 381-397.
DOI
[14]
Z. Wang, J. Li, Z. Wang, and J. Tang, Cross-lingual knowledge linking across wiki knowledge bases, in Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Wide Web Conference, Lyon, France, 2012, pp. 459-468.
DOI
[15]
M. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Rev., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 167-256, Mar. 2003.
[16]
F. Wang and D. Landau, Efficient, multiple-range random walk algorithm to calculate the density of states, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 2050-2053, Jul. 2001.
[17]
K. Murphy, Y. Weiss, and M. Jordan, Loopy belief propagation for approximate inference: An empirical study, in Proceeding of Uncertainty in AI, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999, pp. 467-475.
[18]
T. Moon, The expectation-maximization algorithm, IEEE Trans Signal Processing, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 47-60, Feb. 1996.
[19]
J. Spall, Estimation via markov chain monte carlo, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 34-45, Apr. 2003.
[20]
C. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, New York, USA: Springer, 2006.
[21]
L. Lü and T. Zhou, Link prediction in complex networks: A survey, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 390, no. 6, pp. 1150-1170, Mar. 2011.
[22]
T. Zhou and Y. Zhang, Predicting missing links via local information, The European Physical Journal B, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 623-630, Oct. 2009.
[23]
N. Koudas, S. Sarawagi, and D. Srivastava, Record linkage: Similarity measures and algorithms, in Proceedings of SIGMOD ’06, New York, USA, 2006, pp. 802-803.
DOI
[24]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg, The link prediction problem for social networks, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2003, pp. 556-559.
DOI
[25]
Y. Pan, D. Li, J. Liu, and J. Liang, Detecting community structure in complex networks via node similarity, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 389, no. 14, pp. 2849-2857, Aug. 2010.
[26]
D. Heckerman, D. Geiger, and D. Chickering, Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data, Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 197-243, Mar. 1995.
[27]
C. Wang, V. Satuluri, and S. Parthasarathy, Local probabilistic models for link prediction, in ICDM’07 Proceedings of the 2007 Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Washington DC, USA, 2007, pp. 322-331.
DOI
[28]
C. Wang, J. Han, Y. Jia, J. Tang, D. Zhang, Y. Yu, and J. Guo, Mining advisoradvisee relationships from research publication networks, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, USA, 2010, pp. 203-212.
DOI
[29]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg, Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2010, pp. 641-650.
DOI
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 28 June 2013
Accepted: 28 June 2013
Published: 05 August 2013
Issue date: August 2013

Copyright

© The author(s) 2013

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61170192) and the Natural Science Foundations of Municipality of Chongqing (No. CSTC2012JJB40012).

Rights and permissions

Return