Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
There are significant differences in the corrosion protection performance of commonly used cleaning agents for high-speed railways. In order to study the dual requirements of cleaning efficiency and corrosion inhibition, explore the differences in corrosion protection performance of cleaning agents, effectively protect metal substrates, and ensure the safe, economical, and environmentally friendly operation of high-speed railways, this study is hereby carried out.
This study investigated the corrosion behaviour of Q235 steel exposed to acidic, neutral, and alkaline cleaning agents through metallographic analysis, electrochemical testing, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Electrochemical behaviour was assessed at concentrations of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Tafel tests. The results indicate that the protective efficacy of acidic, neutral, and alkaline cleaning agents follows the order: alkaline > neutral > acidic.
Microstructural analysis and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) surface element quantification reveal that acidic cleaning agents cause the most severe corrosion and offer the poorest protection for Q235 steel, whereas neutral and alkaline agents provide protective effects by retarding corrosion. Conducting in-depth research on the differences in corrosion protection performance of cleaning agents can effectively safeguard metal substrates, eliminate corrosion risks, and ensure the safe operation of high-speed railways.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.
Comments on this article