AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Seismic damage and intensity analysis of conventional railways

Wentao SunYan XuanPeng ZhangXueying Zhou( )Youbiao WangYanzhang LiuXia Wang
Railway Science and Technology Research and Development Center, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to analyze the relationship between seismic damage to various railway infrastructures and seismic intensity through historical seismic damage investigations of conventional railways, thereby addressing the issues of a lack of focus in post-earthquake inspections and prolonged train service restoration times after seismic events.

Design/methodology/approach

Post-earthquake railway inspection data were collected from 6 historical earthquakes in Xinjiang and 4 in the Sichuan-Yunnan region through field surveys and data research. Longitude and latitude coordinates of damaged sections were calculated according to their kilometer markers (K marks) and visualized on maps. The approximate seismic intensity at each damage site was estimated using intensity attenuation relationships or instrumental intensity data from adjacent stations, and empirical patterns of seismic damage modes were summarized.

Findings

Through investigations of historical seismic data and actual railway damage in Xinjiang and the Sichuan-Yunnan region, results indicate that in areas with seismic intensity greater than Level V (I > V), main structural damage to conventional railway infrastructure occurs. This includes cracking of bridge piers and abutments, differential settlement at bridge ends, track distortion, fracture of tunnel portals, and edge collapse, all of which disrupt train operations. In contrast, in areas with seismic intensity of Level Vor below (I = V), no records indicate that earthquakes caused main structural damage to conventional railway infrastructure. Only damage to ancillary facilities was observed, such as concrete spalling from girders, cracking of transverse diaphragms, damaged protective cones, deformed limiters, and cracks in subgrade slopes—none of which affect train passage.

Originality/value

Based on investigations into the post-earthquake infrastructure conditions of conventional-speed railways in earthquake-prone regions of China such as Xinjiang, Sichuan and Yunnan after 10 historical earthquakes, this study analyzed the correlation between seismic damage and corresponding seismic intensities using instrumental intensity data from surrounding seismic stations and intensity attenuation laws. A conclusion was drawn that train operation remains unaffected in areas with seismic intensity no higher than V (I = V). For the first time, this research established a correlation between post-earthquake damage to conventional-speed railways and seismic intensity, and identified the safety threshold at seismic intensity V. The findings enable railway personnel to conduct targeted post-earthquake inspections, significantly reduce inspection workload, and alleviate the pressure on post-earthquake operation recovery.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Railway Sciences
Pages 436-449

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Sun W, Xuan Y, Zhang P, et al. Seismic damage and intensity analysis of conventional railways. Railway Sciences, 2026, 5(3): 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1108/RS-03-2026-0019

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 10 March 2026
Revised: 13 April 2026
Accepted: 15 April 2026
Published: 01 June 2026
© Wentao Sun, Yan Xuan, Peng Zhang, Xueying Zhou, Youbiao Wang, Yanzhang Liu and Xia Wang. Published in Railway Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited.

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/