Low-carbon solid waste materials for railway sub-ballast layers: a review of mechanical performance, sustainability and regulatory gaps

This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of low-carbon solid waste materials applied in railway sub-ballast layers, aiming to critically assess their mechanical performance, durability, environmental benefits and regulatory readiness. The study addresses the growing need to decarbonize rail infrastructure while reducing dependence on natural aggregates, positioning sub-ballast as a strategic layer for circular economy implementation in ballasted track systems.

A PRISMA-based systematic review methodology was adopted to identify, screen and analyses peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025. The final database comprises experimental, numerical and field investigations covering mining residues, steel slags, construction and demolition waste, rubberized composites, alkali-activated materials and other industrial by-products applied to railway sub-ballast. Mechanical behavior under cyclic loading, resilient modulus, permanent deformation, hydraulic performance, durability and environmental indicators were extracted and synthesized. In parallel, an international regulatory analysis was conducted to compare sub-ballast specifications across Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific and Brazil, enabling identification of performance-regulation gaps and barriers to implementation.

The review demonstrates that several low-carbon waste-derived materials exhibit mechanical performance comparable to or exceeding that of conventional granular sub-ballast, particularly in terms of stiffness retention, resistance to permanent deformation and degradation under repeated loading. Steel slags, recycled concrete aggregates, slate waste and rubber-modified blends consistently show favorable resilient behavior and enhanced damping capacity, while certain mining residues and alkali-activated granular systems present promising strength and durability characteristics. Life-cycle evidence indicates substantial reductions in embodied carbon and natural aggregate consumption when these materials are adopted. However, current railway standards remain largely prescriptive and index-based, rarely incorporating cyclic performance criteria or carbon metrics, creating a structural disconnect between scientific evidence and regulatory acceptance. This gap significantly limits large-scale implementation despite growing technical maturity.

This study provides the first integrated synthesis focused exclusively on low-carbon solid waste materials for railway sub-ballast, combining mechanical performance, environmental assessment and international regulatory comparison within a unified analytical framework. By explicitly linking laboratory evidence to policy and standardization challenges, the paper advances performance-based pathways for sustainable railway substructure design. The findings offer actionable guidance for infrastructure managers, regulators and researchers seeking to accelerate the transition toward circular, low-carbon rail systems through sub-ballast innovation.