501
Views
8
Downloads
1
Crossref
N/A
WoS
1
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
Intelligence level of a crowd network is defined as the expected reward of the network when completing the latest tasks (e.g. last N tasks). The purpose of this paper is to improve the intelligence level of a crowd network by optimizing the profession distribution of the crowd network.
Based on the concept of information entropy, this paper introduces the concept of business entropy and puts forward several factors affecting business entropy to analyze the relationship between the intelligence level and the profession distribution of the crowd network. This paper introduced Profession Distribution Deviation and Subject Interaction Pattern as the two factors which affect business entropy. By quantifying and combining the two factors, a Multi-Factor Business Entropy Quantitative (MFBEQ) model is proposed to calculate the business entropy of a crowd network. Finally, the differential evolution model and k-means clustering are applied to crowd intelligence network, and the species distribution of intelligent subjects is found, so as to achieve quantitative analysis of business entropy.
By establishing the MFBEQ model, this paper found that when the profession distribution of a crowd network is deviate less to the expected distribution, the intelligence level of a crowd network will be higher. Moreover, when subjects within the crowd network interact with each other more actively, the intelligence level of a crowd network becomes higher.
This paper aims to build the MFBEQ model according to factors that are related to business entropy and then uses the model to evaluate the intelligence level of a number of crowd networks.
Intelligence level of a crowd network is defined as the expected reward of the network when completing the latest tasks (e.g. last N tasks). The purpose of this paper is to improve the intelligence level of a crowd network by optimizing the profession distribution of the crowd network.
Based on the concept of information entropy, this paper introduces the concept of business entropy and puts forward several factors affecting business entropy to analyze the relationship between the intelligence level and the profession distribution of the crowd network. This paper introduced Profession Distribution Deviation and Subject Interaction Pattern as the two factors which affect business entropy. By quantifying and combining the two factors, a Multi-Factor Business Entropy Quantitative (MFBEQ) model is proposed to calculate the business entropy of a crowd network. Finally, the differential evolution model and k-means clustering are applied to crowd intelligence network, and the species distribution of intelligent subjects is found, so as to achieve quantitative analysis of business entropy.
By establishing the MFBEQ model, this paper found that when the profession distribution of a crowd network is deviate less to the expected distribution, the intelligence level of a crowd network will be higher. Moreover, when subjects within the crowd network interact with each other more actively, the intelligence level of a crowd network becomes higher.
This paper aims to build the MFBEQ model according to factors that are related to business entropy and then uses the model to evaluate the intelligence level of a number of crowd networks.
Bird, D. and Munoz, C. (1983), “Automatic generation of random self-checking test cases”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 229-245.
Chapman, R.L., Soosay, C. and Kandampully, J. (2003), “Innovation in logistics services and the new business model: a conceptual framework”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 630-650.
Grefen, P., Aberer, K., Hoffner, Y. and Ludwig, H. (2000), “Cross flow: cross – organizational workflow management in dynamic virtual enterprises”, International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 227-290.
He, N., Li, D., Gan, W. and Zhu, X. (2007), “Computer science”, A Review of the Discovery of Important Nodes in Complex Networks, Vol. 34 No. 12, pp. 1-5.
Jennings, N.R. (1995), “Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-subject systems using joint intentions”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 75 No. 2, pp. 195-240.
Laszlo, M. and Mukherjee, S. (2007), “A genetic algorithm that exchanges neighboring centers for k-means clustering”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 28 No. 16, pp. 2359-2366.
Lee, J. and Kramer, B.M. (1992), “Analysis of machine degradation using neural networks based pattern discrimination n-model”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 379-387.
Liu, J., Pan, Z., Xu, J., Liang, B., Chen, Y. and Ji, W. (2018b), “Quality-time-complexity universal intelligence measurement”, International Journal of Crowd Science, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 99-107.
Nelson, H. and O’Connel, A. (1978), “Estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult reading test”, Cortex, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 234-244.
Neubauer, A. and Fink, A. (2009), “Intelligence and neural efficiency”, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 1004-1023.
Omran, M.G.H., Engelbrecht, A.P. and Salman, A. (2005), “Dynamic clustering using particle swarm optimization with application in unsupervised image classification”, Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9 No. 11, pp. 199-204.
Paninski, L. (2003), “Estimation of entropy and mutual information”, Neural Computation, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1191-1253.
Persson, G. and Virum, H. (2001), “Growth strategies for logistics service providers, a case study”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 53-64.
Ren, Z., Shao, F., Liu, J. and Guo, Q. (2013), “BingHong Wang: research on importance measurement method of network nodes based on degree and clustering coefficient”, Acta Physica Sinica, Vol. 62 No. 12, pp. 1-5.
Storn, R. and Price, K. (1997), “Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces”, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 341-359.
Xiao, S., Wei, C.-P. and Dong, M. (2016), “Crowd intelligence: analyzing online product reviews for preference measurement”, Information and Management, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 169-182.
Yuan, Y. and Wang, F.Y. (2016), “Block chain: the state of the art and future trends”, Acta Automatica Sinica, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 481-494.
This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1400100) and the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No. 61671049, 61301002.
Zhouxia Li, Zhiwen Pan, Xiaoni Wang, Wen Ji and Feng Yang. Published in International Journal of Crowd Science. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode