Knowledge payment research: status quo and key issues

Tuotuo Qi; Tianmei Wang; Yanlin Ma; Xinxue Zhou

doi:10.1108/IJCS-01-2019-0007

International Journal of Crowd Science 2019, 3(2): 117-137 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-01-2019-0007

Literature review |

Open Access | Issue | Published: 16 July 2019

Knowledge payment research: status quo and key issues

Show Author's Information Hide Author's Information Tuotuo Qi, Tianmei Wang(

), Yanlin Ma, Xinxue Zhou

Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China

Keywords:

Knowledge payment, Knowledge demander, Knowledge payment platform, Knowledge provider, Paid Q&A, Knowledge supplier

Cite this article:

Qi T, Wang T, Ma Y, et al. Knowledge payment research: status quo and key issues. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2019, 3(2): 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-01-2019-0007

Download citation

EndNote(RIS)

BibTeX

342

Views

Downloads

Citations

Crossref

N/A

WoS

Scopus

N/A

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Abstract

Purpose

Knowledge sharing has entered the stage of knowledge payment with the typical models of paid Q&A, live session, paid subscription, course column and community service. Numerous knowledge suppliers have begun to pour into the knowledge payment market, and users' willingness to pay for premium content has increased. However, the academic research on knowledge payment has just begun.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, the authors searched several bibliographic databases using keywords such as “knowledge payment”, “paid Q&A”, “pay for answer”, “social Q&A”, “paywall” and “online health consultation” and selected papers from aspects of research scenes, research topics, etc. Finally, a total of 116 articles were identified for combing studies.

Findings

This study found that in the early research, scholars paid attention to the definition of knowledge payment concept and the discrimination of typical models. With the continuous enrichment of research literature, the research direction has gradually been refined into three main branches from the perspective of research objects, i.e. knowledge provider, knowledge demander and knowledge payment platform.

Originality/value

This paper focuses on discussing and sorting out the key research issues from these three research genres. Finally, the authors found out conflicting and contradictory research results and research gaps in the existing research and then put forward the urgent research topics.

Full text

Abstract

Full text

Outline

About this article

Knowledge payment research: status quo and key issues

Show Author's information Hide Author's Information Tuotuo Qi, Tianmei Wang(

), Yanlin Ma, Xinxue Zhou

Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China

Abstract

Purpose

Design/methodology/approach

Findings

Originality/value

Keywords: Knowledge payment, Knowledge demander, Knowledge payment platform, Knowledge provider, Paid Q&A, Knowledge supplier

References(116)

Aggarwal, R., Gopal, R., Gupta, A. and Singh, H. (2012), “Putting money where the mouths are: the relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, pp. 976-992.

DOI Google Scholar

Ambalov, I.A. (2018), “A meta-analysis of is continuance: an evaluation of the expectation-confirmation model”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 1561-1571.

DOI Google Scholar

Atanasova, S., Kamin, T. and Petrič, G. (2018), “The benefits and challenges of online professional-patient interaction: comparing views between users and health professional moderators in an online health community”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 83, pp. 106-118.

DOI Google Scholar

Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G. and Lee, J.N. (2005), “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 87-111.

DOI Google Scholar

Botsman, R. (2014), “Sharing's not just for start-ups”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92 No. 9, pp. 23-25.

Google Scholar

Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M.D. (2000), “Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 563-585.

DOI Google Scholar

Cabrera, A., Collins, W.C. and Salgado, J.F. (2006), “Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 245-264.

DOI Google Scholar

Campo, S. and Jesús Yagüe, M. (2009), “Exploring non-linear effects of determinants on tourists' satisfaction”, International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 127-138.

DOI Google Scholar

Cao, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, Z., Hu, J. and Chen, X. (2017), “Online selection of a physician by patients: empirical study from elaboration likelihood perspective”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 73, pp. 403-412.

DOI Google Scholar

Carillo, K., Scornavacca, E. and Za, S. (2017), “The role of media dependency in predicting continuance intention to use ubiquitous media systems”, Information and Management, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 317-335.

DOI Google Scholar

Cavusoglu, H., Li, Z. and Huang, K.-W. (2015), “Can gamification motivate voluntary contributions? The case of stackoverflow Q&A community”,Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference companion on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, pp. 171-174.https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2698999

DOI

Cellary, W. (2010), “Paid content a way to electronic knowledge-based economy”, East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15576-5_2

DOI

Chen, Y., Ho, T.-H. and Kim, Y.-M. (2010), “Knowledge market design: a field experiment at google answers”, Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 641-664.

DOI Google Scholar

Chen, L. Rai, A. and Guo, X. (2015), “Physicians’ online popularity and price premiums for online health consultations: a combined signaling theory and online feedback mechanisms explanation”, ICIS2015.

Chevalier, J.A. and Mayzlin, D. (2006), “The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 345-354.

DOI Google Scholar

Chintagunta, P.K., Gopinath, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2010), “The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets”,Marketing Science, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 944-957.

DOI Google Scholar

Chu, C.-W. and Lu, H.-P. (2007), “Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: an empirical study based on the value-intention framework”, Internet Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 139-155.

DOI Google Scholar

Clemes, M.D., Gan, C., Kao, T.-H. and Choong, M. (2008), “An empirical analysis of customer satisfaction in international air travel”, Innovative Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 50-62.

Google Scholar

Cummings, J.N. (2004), “Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization”, Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 352-364.

DOI Google Scholar

Dapkevicius, A. and Melnikas, B. (2009), “Influence of price and quality to customer satisfaction: Neuromarketing approach”, Mokslas - Lietuvos Ateitis, Vol. 1 No. 3, p. 17.

DOI Google Scholar

Dawes, J. (2009), “The effect of service price increases on customer retention: the moderating role of customer tenure and relationship breadth”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 232-245.

DOI Google Scholar

Dhar, V. and Chang, E.A. (2009), “Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 300-307.

DOI Google Scholar

Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. and Pearo, L.K. (2004), “A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 241-263.

DOI Google Scholar

Ding, Y. (2018), “Modelling continued use of information systems from a forward-looking perspective: antecedents and consequences of hope and anticipated regret”, Information and Management, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 461-471.

DOI Google Scholar

Donovan, E.E., Lefebvre, L., Tardif, S., Brown, L.E. and Love, B. (2014), “Patterns of social support communicated in response to expressions of uncertainty in an online community of young adults with cancer”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 432-455.

DOI Google Scholar

Dorsey, D.W. (2003), “Hiring for knowledge-based competition”, Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management, Vol. 21, p. 155.

Google Scholar

Duan, W., Gu, B. and Whinston, A.B. (2008), “Do online reviews matter?-An empirical investigation of panel data”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 1007-1016.

DOI Google Scholar

Farzan, R., DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Brownholtz, B., Geyer, W. and Dugan, C. (2008), “When the experiment is over: deploying an incentive system to all the users”, Symposium on persuasive technology.

Finley, K. (2013), “Trust in the sharing economy: an exploratory study”, Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, Vol. 2.

Google Scholar

Galehbakhtiari, S. (2015), “A hermeneutic phenomenological study of online community participation: applications of fuzzy cognitive maps”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 48, pp. 637-643.

DOI Google Scholar

Guo, S., Guo, X., Fang, Y. and Vogel, D. (2017), “How doctors gain social and economic returns in online health-care communities: a professional capital perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 487-519.

DOI Google Scholar

Guo, S., Guo, X., Zhang, X. and Vogel, D. (2018), “Doctor–patient relationship strength’s impact in an online healthcare community”,Information Technology for Development, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 279-300.

DOI Google Scholar

Ğüt, H. and Onur Taş, B.K. (2012), “The influence of internet customer reviews on the online sales and prices in hotel industry”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 197-214.

DOI Google Scholar

Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S. and Konstan, J.A. (2008), “Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites”,Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 865-874.https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357191

DOI

Harper, F.M., Xin, L.S., Chen, Y. and Konstan, J.A. (2007), “Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community”, International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 148-159.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_20

DOI

Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S.D. (2010), “The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine”, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pp. 431-440.https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772735

DOI

Hsieh, G. and Counts, S. (2009), “Mimir: a market-based real-time question and answer service”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 769-778.https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518820

DOI

Hsieh, G., Kraut Robert, E. and Hudson Scott, E. (2010), “Why pay? Exploring how financial incentives are used for question and answer”, Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753373

DOI

Huang, J.S. and Wang, W.-C. (2014), “Application of the long tail economy to the online news market: examining predictors of market performance”, Journal of Media Economics, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 158-176.

DOI Google Scholar

Iresearch (2018), “Research report about online knowledge payment market in china 2018”, Iresearch.

Jan, S.T., Wang, C., Zhang, Q. and Wang, G. (2018), “Pay-per-question: towards targeted Q&A with payments”,Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, pp. 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148332

DOI

Janes, J., Hill, C. and Rolfe, A. (2001), “Ask-an-expert services analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 13, pp. 1106-1121.

DOI Google Scholar

Jeon, G.Y. and Rieh, S.Y. (2014), “Answers from the crowd: how credible are strangers in social Q&A?”,iConference 2014 Proceedings.

Jeon, G.Y., Kim, Y.M. and Chen, Y. (2010), “Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online Q&A site”,Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 325-328.https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753375

DOI

Jia, W. and Tong, N. (2015), “Diabetes prevention and continuing health-care reform in china”,The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, Vol. 3 No. 11, pp. 840-842.

DOI Google Scholar

Jin, Y., Huang, J. and Wang, X. (2017), “What influences content popularity? An empirical investigation of voting in social Q&A communities”,Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).

Jin, X.L., Zhou, Z., Lee, M.K. and Cheung, C.M. (2013), “Why users keep answering questions in online question answering communities: a theoretical and empirical investigation”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 93-104.

DOI Google Scholar

Joyce, E. and Kraut, R.E. (2006), “Predicting continued participation in newsgroups”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 723-747.

DOI Google Scholar

Katz, S.J. and Moyer, C.A. (2004), “The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers”, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 19 No. 9, pp. 978-983.

DOI Google Scholar

Khusro, S., Alam, A. and Khalid, S. (2017), “Social question and answer sites: the story so far”, Program, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 170-192.

DOI Google Scholar

Kim, S., Oh, J.S. and Oh, S. (2007), “Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective”,Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1-15.

DOI

Lai, H.-M. and Chen, T.T. (2014), “Knowledge sharing in interest online communities: a comparison of posters and lurkers”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 35, pp. 295-306.

DOI Google Scholar

Lee, K., Lee, B. and Oh, W. (2015), “Thumbs up, sales up? The contingent effect of Facebook likes on sales performance in social commerce”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 109-143.

DOI Google Scholar

Lee, U., Kang, H., Yi, E., Yi, M. and Kantola, J. (2012), “Understanding mobile Q&A usage: an exploratory study”,Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3215-3224.https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208741

DOI

Lee, U., Kim, J., Yi, E., Sung, J. and Gerla, M. (2013), “Analyzing crowd workers in mobile pay-for-answer Q&A”,Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 533-542.https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470730

DOI

Li, J., Zhang, Y., Ma, L. and Liu, X. (2016), “The impact of the internet on health consultation market concentration: an econometric analysis of secondary data”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 18 No. 10.

DOI Google Scholar

Li, J., Zhang, S., Wang, W. and Wang, Y. (2017), “Research on the influencing factors of user’s online knowledge consumption behavior”,Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 122, pp. 174-179.

DOI Google Scholar

Liu, J. and Ye, Q. (2015), “How price affect online purchase behavior in online healthcare consulting? Perceived quality as a mediator”, International Conference on Smart Health, pp. 196-203.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29175-8_18

DOI

Lin, T.C., Hsu, J.S.C. and Chen, H.C. (2013), “Customer willingness to pay for online music: the role of free mentality”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14 No. 4.

Google Scholar

Lou, J., Fang, Y., Lim, K.H. and Peng, J.Z. (2013), “Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities”,Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 356-371.

DOI

Lueg, C. and Fisher, D. (2012), From Usenet to Cowebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, Springer Science and Business Media.

Lunt, T. and Curran, J. (2010), “‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback ”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 759-769.

DOI Google Scholar

Luo, W. and Chung, Q.B. (2010), “Retailer reputation and online pricing strategy”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 50-56.

Google Scholar

Mahmud, A. and Jusoff, K. (2013), “The effect of service quality and price on satisfaction and loyalty of customer of commercial flight service industry”.

Malik, M.E., Ghafoor, M.M. and Hafiz, K.I. (2012), “Impact of brand image, service quality and price on customer satisfaction in Pakistan telecommunication sector”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 23.

Google Scholar

Matzler, K., Würtele, A. and Renzl, B. (2006), “Dimensions of price satisfaction: a study in the retail banking industry”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 216-231.

DOI Google Scholar

Mensing, D. (2007), “Online revenue business model has changed little since 1996”, Newspaper Research Journal, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 22-37.

DOI Google Scholar

Nonnecke, R.B. (2000), Lurking in Email-Based Discussion Lists, Place Pulished, South Bank University, London.

Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. (2000), “Lurker demographics: counting the silent”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73-80.https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332409

DOI

Oh, H., Animesh, A. and Pinsonneault, A. (2013), “Free vs for a fee: the impact of information pricing strategy on the pattern and effectiveness of word-of-mouth via social media”, Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, pp. 1-18.

Pan, D. (2018), “Research on the influence factors of online health community doctors' service prices”, 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 5541-5546.https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2018.8408097

DOI

Pan, X., Ratchford, B., T. and Shankar, V. (2002), “Can price dispersion in online markets be explained by differences in e-tailer service quality?”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 433-445.

DOI Google Scholar

Paul, S.A. Hong, L. and Chi, E.H. (2012), “Who is authoritative? Understanding reputation mechanisms in quora”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.3724.

Pedraja Iglesias, M. and Jesus Yagüe Guillén, M. (2004), “Perceived quality and price: their impact on the satisfaction of restaurant customers”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 373-379.

DOI Google Scholar

Preece, J. (2000), “Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 100 No. 9, pp. 459-460.

DOI Google Scholar

Preece, J., Nonnecke, B. and Andrews, D. (2004), “The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 201-223.

DOI Google Scholar

Punj, G. (2015), “The relationship between consumer characteristics and willingness to pay for general online content: implications for content providers considering subscription-based business models”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 175-186.

DOI Google Scholar

Raban, D.R. (2008), “The incentive structure in an online information market”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 14, pp. 2284-2295.

DOI Google Scholar

Rau, P.-L.P., Gao, Q. and Ding, Y. (2008), “Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 2757-2770.

DOI Google Scholar

Ren, Y., Harper, F.M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J. and Kraut, R.E. (2012), “Building member attachment in online communities: applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 841-864.

DOI Google Scholar

Ridings, C.M. and Gefen, D. (2004), “Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 10 No. 1.

Google Scholar

Roberts, J.A., Hann, I.-H. and Slaughter, S.A. (2006), “Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: a longitudinal study of the apache projects”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 984-999.

DOI Google Scholar

Ruth, R.D. (2012), “Conversation as a source of satisfaction and continuance in a question-and-answer site”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 427-437.

DOI Google Scholar

Serrano, C.I. and Karahanna, E. (2016), “The compensatory interaction between user capabiities and technology capabilities in influencing task performance: an empirical assessment in telemedicine consultations”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 597-621.

DOI Google Scholar

Shah, C., Oh, J.S. and Oh, S. (2008), “Exploring characteristics and effects of user participation in online social Q&A sites”,First Monday, Vol. 13 No. 9.

DOI

Sherman, L.E., Michikyan, M. and Greenfield, P.M. (2013), “The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends”, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, Vol. 7 No. 2.

DOI Google Scholar

Shuyler, K.S. and Knight, K.M. (2003), “What are patients seeking when they turn to the internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics web site”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 5 No. 4.

DOI Google Scholar

SIC (2017), “The development of Chinese sharing economy in 2017”, SIC, Beijing.

Song, Y., Jin, M.Z. and Ren, P.Y. (2014), “Empirical study on personal motivation of UGC in Q&A community”,Pakistan Journal of Statistics, Vol. 30 No. 5.

Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R. and Jensen, R.J. (2004), “When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity”, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 600-613.

DOI Google Scholar

Wang, S. and Noe, R.A. (2010), “Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 115-131.

DOI Google Scholar

Wang, J.N., Chiu, Y.L., Yu, H. and Hsu, Y.T. (2017), “Understanding a nonlinear causal relationship between rewards and physicians’ contributions in online health care communities: Longitudinal study”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19 No. 12.

DOI Google Scholar

Wang, B., Zhang, X., Wang, G., Zheng, H. and Zhao, B.Y. (2016), “Anatomy of a personalized livestreaming system”, Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 485-498.https://doi.org/10.1145/2987443.2987453

DOI

Wang, C.L., Zhang, Y., Ye, L.R. and Nguyen, D.D. (2005), “Subscription to fee-based online services: what makes consumer pay for online content?”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, p. 304.

Google Scholar

Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005), “Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 35-57.

DOI Google Scholar

Wolk, A. and Theysohn, S. (2007), “Factors influencing website traffic in the paid content market”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 23 Nos 7/8, pp. 769-796.

DOI Google Scholar

Wu, H. and Lu, N. (2018), “Service provision, pricing, and patient satisfaction in online health communities”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 110, pp. 77-89.

DOI Google Scholar

Wun, Y.T., Lam, T.P., Lam, K.F., Goldberg, D., Li, D.K. and Yip, K.C. (2010), “How do patients choose their doctors for primary care in a free market?”, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 1215-1220.

DOI Google Scholar

Xiao, N., Sharman, R., Rao, H.R. and Upadhyaya, S. (2014), “Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey”,Decision Support Systems, Vol. 57, pp. 417-427.

DOI Google Scholar

Xing, X., Tang, F.-F. and Yang, Z. (2004), “Pricing dynamics in the online consumer electronics market”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 429-441.

DOI Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Kuang, L., Huang, N. and Hong, Y. (2018), “Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform”.Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 289-320.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154655

DOI

Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y. and Zhang, H. (2016), “Knowledge sharing in online health communities: a social exchange theory perspective”, Information and Management, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 643-653.

DOI Google Scholar

Yang, M. Diao, Y. and Kiang, M. (2018), “Physicians’ sales of expert service online: the role of physician trust and price”.

Yang, S., Liu, Y. and Wei, J. (2016), “Social Capital on mobile SNS addiction: a perspective from online and offline channel integrations”, Internet Research, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 982-1000.

DOI Google Scholar

Ybarra, M. and Suman, M. (2006), “Reasons, assessments and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of internet health information”, Health Education Research, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 512-521.

DOI Google Scholar

Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B. and Chen, W. (2011), “The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: an empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 634-639.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Xiao, Y. and Cheng, Y. (2018), Global Challenges and Developmental Lessons in the Knowledge Sharing Economy, Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1505071

DOI

Zhang, C.B., Li, Y.N., Wu, B. and Li, D.J. (2017a), “How wechat can retain users: roles of network externalities, social interaction ties, and perceived values in building continuance intention”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 69, pp. 284-293.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Zhang, F., Lin, M. and Du, H.S. (2017b), “Knowledge sharing among innovative customers in a virtual innovation community: the roles of psychological capital, material reward and reciprocal relationship”, Online Information Review, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 691-709.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Zhu, M., Liu, X. and Yang, J. (2017c), “Why should i pay for e-books? An empirical study to investigate Chinese readers’ purchase behavioural intention in the mobile era”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 472-493.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Liu, S., Chen, X. and Gong, Y. (2017d), “Social capital, motivations, and knowledge sharing intention in health Q&A communities”,Management Decision, Vol. 55 No. 7, pp. 1536-1557.

DOI

Zhang, X., Liu, S., Deng, Z. and Chen, X. (2017e), “Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: a comparative study of health professionals and normal users”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 75, pp. 797-810.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., Yuan, X. and Zhou, R. (2018), “How knowledge contributor characteristics and reputation affect user payment decision in paid Q&A? An empirical analysis from the perspective of trust theory”,Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 31, pp. 1-11.

DOI

Zhou, T. (2018), “Understanding online knowledge community user continuance: a social cognitive theory perspective”, Data Technologies and Applications, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 445-458.

DOI Google Scholar

Zhu, Z. Bernhard, D. and Gurevych, I. (2009), “A multi-dimensional model for assessing the quality of answers in social Q&A sites”, Place Pulished.

Zhu, H., Das, S., Cao, Y., Yu, S., Kittur, A. and Kraut, R. (2016), “A market in your social network: the effects of extrinsic rewards on friendsourcing and relationships”, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 598-609.https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858396

DOI

About this article

Publication history

Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 30 January 2019

Revised: 09 May 2019

Accepted: 16 June 2019

Published: 16 July 2019

Issue date: September 2019

Copyright

Rights and permissions

Tuotuo Qi, Tianmei Wang, Yanlin Ma and Xinxue Zhou. Published in International Journal of Crowd Science. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode