AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning

Xiaolin Ji1,2, Xinze Li1,2, Zhongqiu Lu1,2 ( )
Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Early diagnosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) remains challenging because the initial clinical features overlap with those of cellulitis and other clinical mimics.

• The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis and related laboratory-based scores show variable sensitivities across settings and should not delay surgical consultation when NSTIs are clinically suspected.

• Imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging/point-of-care ultrasound) can support triage, but no single modality is definitive, especially for hemodynamically unstable intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

• Multi-omics profiling (transcriptomics, proteomics, immunomics, and metabolomics) reveals pathogen- and host-response signatures that may improve diagnostic and prognostic stratification.

• Machine learning models integrating clinical, imaging, and omics data provide a framework for personalized risk prediction and an ICU-oriented diagnostic roadmap.

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent a group of rapidly progressing, life-threatening infections characterized by widespread tissue necrosis, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure. Early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of nonspecific initial manifestations and overlapping symptoms with other soft tissue infections. Diagnostic scoring systems such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score and its variants have been widely utilized to facilitate early recognition but are limited by variable sensitivity and insufficient predictive value across diverse clinical populations. Recent advances in multi-omics technologies and machine learning approaches have enabled the identification of molecular biomarkers and predictive patterns associated with NSTI onset and progression. Integration of high-dimensional omics data with clinical and imaging parameters holds potential for dynamic, real-time diagnostic support, and individualized risk stratification in the intensive care setting. This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic strategies for NSTIs, critically appraises the limitations of conventional clinical scoring systems, and examines emerging omics-based and ML-driven approaches. Finally, we propose an integrated diagnostic roadmap that aligns clinical assessment, imaging, microbiologic evaluation, host-response biomarkers, and multi-omics data to guide future research and clinical translation.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Burns & Trauma
Article number: tkag028

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ji X, Li X, Lu Z. Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning. Burns & Trauma, 2026, 14(3): tkag028. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkag028

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 09 October 2025
Revised: 02 April 2026
Accepted: 02 April 2026
Published: 14 April 2026
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.