AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Virtual reality as a pain reduction method in burn and wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Marina Moreno-Martínez1,2 Artur Dalfó-Pibernat3 ( )Josep Vidal-Alaball1,2 
Unitat de Recerca i Innovació, Gerència d’Atenció Primària i a la Comunitat de la Catalunya Central, Institut Català de la Salut, Soler i March, 6, (08242) Manresa, Spain
Intelligence for Primary Care Research Group, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina, Soler i March, 6, (08242) Manresa, Spain
Centre d’Atenció Primària Horta, Gerència Territorial de Barcelona ciutat, Institut Català de la Salut, Lisboa s/n, Horta-Guinardó, (08032) Barcelona, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Burns and wounds cause significant physical and psychological distress, with pain being a major barrier to recovery. Traditional pharmacological methods for pain management carry risks such as side effects and dependency. Virtual reality has emerged as a non-invasive, distraction-based technique that may reduce pain perception during wound care by modulating sensory input.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251005004), assessed the effectiveness of virtual reality in managing pain during wound and burn care. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted in March 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing virtual reality interventions to standard care or other distraction techniques in patients with active wounds or burns. Data on pain outcomes, as well as physiological indicators, were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and Hedges’ g as the effect size estimator. The analysis was performed with SPSS version 29 and the risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool.

Results

Eleven studies (n = 936 participants) were included, with diverse wound types (burns, surgical, limb injuries) and virtual reality setups, predominantly immersive. The overall pooled effect showed a statistically significant reduction in pain using virtual reality (g = −1.528; 95% CI: −2.259 to −0.797; p < 0.001), indicating a moderate-to-large effect. Subgroup analysis revealed that virtual reality was most effective in children (g = −2.348), followed by adolescents (g = −0.538), while adults showed a non-significant effect (g = −1.453). High heterogeneity (I2 = 95.5%) was explained by age group differences and sensitivity analysis. No significant publication bias was detected.

Conclusions

Virtual reality appears to be a promising tool for reducing procedural pain, particularly in children with wounds or burns. Its efficacy in adolescents is moderate, while evidence in adults remains inconclusive. Given its non-pharmacological nature and potential to improve patient experience, virtual reality warrants broader implementation and further age-specific research in wound care settings.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Burns & Trauma
Article number: tkaf061

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Moreno-Martínez M, Dalfó-Pibernat A, Vidal-Alaball J. Virtual reality as a pain reduction method in burn and wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns & Trauma, 2026, 14(1): tkaf061. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaf061

164

Views

2

Downloads

2

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 09 May 2025
Revised: 20 August 2025
Accepted: 25 August 2025
Published: 01 September 2025
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.