AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review

Neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis: trade-off between pros and cons

Fengying Liao1 , Jiangbo Fan1, Rui Wang1,2, Zhe Xu1,3, Qinyuan Li1,4, Wanda Bi1 , Jin Deng3, Jianxin Jiang1, Zhen Wang2( ), Ling Zeng1 ( )
Department of Trauma Medical Center, Daping Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
Department of Respiratory Medicine Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) play a dual role in sepsis, exhibiting both protective antimicrobial effects and contributing to tissue damage and coagulopathy, creating a complex therapeutic challenge.

• This review provides a deeply integrated and mechanistically focused overview of the varying NETosis pathways (suicidal, vital, and noncanonical) and their distinct consequences in sepsis.

• Understanding the complex regulatory networks governing NET formation is critical. This review moves beyond simple models to offer an updated view of these intricate pathways.

• Therapeutic strategies targeting NETs require careful consideration. This review presents a more nuanced discussion of therapeutic strategies, acknowledging the inherent challenges and potential for off-target effects.

Abstract

Sepsis, a life-threatening syndrome driven by dysregulated immune responses to infection, presents significant global health challenges with high mortality rates. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), composed of deoxyribonucleic acid and antimicrobial proteins, play a dual role in sepsis pathogenesis. While NETs trap pathogens and enhance immune responses via antimicrobial activity and immune cell activation, their overproduction exacerbates tissue damage, coagulopathy, and organ dysfunction. This review explores the mechanisms of NET formation, including suicidal, vital, and noncanonical NETosis, and their regulation through pattern recognition receptors, complement systems, and chemokine signaling. The interplay between NETs and immune cells—such as macrophages, T cells, and platelets—is highlighted, emphasizing NETs’ role in both pathogen clearance and inflammatory injury. Excessive NETs contribute to sepsis-associated coagulopathy by activating platelets and damaging endothelial cells, while histones and proteases within NETs mediate cytotoxicity. Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting NETs, such as deoxyribonuclease, PAD4 inhibitors, and anti-inflammatory agents, show promise in preclinical studies but face clinical challenges due to their dual roles and off-target effects. Balancing NETs’ protective and pathological functions remains critical for sepsis management. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of NETs in sepsis, offering insights for future research and clinical applications.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Burns & Trauma
Article number: tkaf046

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liao F, Fan J, Wang R, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis: trade-off between pros and cons. Burns & Trauma, 2025, 13(9): tkaf046. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaf046

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

23

Scopus

Received: 21 January 2025
Revised: 13 July 2025
Accepted: 14 July 2025
Published: 15 July 2025
Published by Oxford University Press 2025. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.