AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (808.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Sepsis after trauma—evolving paradigms in stress biology and host response failure

Petra Dickmann1,2 , Ralf A. Claus1 , Michael Bauer1,2,3 ( )
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
Leibniz Centre for Photonics in Infection Research (LPI), Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
Cluster of Excellence Balance of the Microverse, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, ürstengraben 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Understanding of the host response to trauma is currently changing with the recognition of the human host as a ‘holobiont’, advancing earlier concepts ofthe gut as ‘source and motor’ of multi-organ dysfunction in severe trauma.

• Divergent inflammatory phenotypes, such as ‘hyperinflammation’ or ‘immunoparalysis’ have been described in trauma and sepsis replacing the formerconcept of ‘systemic inflammatory response syndrome’ as a stereotypic damaging mechanism.

• More recent insights into stress biology suggest a need to consider aspects of dose responses or ‘hormesis’. The host response to trauma and eventualsubsequent infection should be interpreted as a biphasic rather than a linear, non-threshold damaging response.

Abstract

Severe trauma is often complicated by subsequent infection and organ dysfunction, with sepsis being a major mortality risk factor. Factors such as barrier destruction, wound contamination, invasive procedures, injury severity, and shock were traditionally considered primary predisposing elements for post-trauma sepsis. However, recent advances in stress biology have revealed a more nuanced understanding of the body's response to trauma. Organisms have evolved adaptive responses to various noxious stimuli that follow a biphasic pattern: Low to moderate stress levels can increase resilience, while overwhelming insults, both acute and chronic, overstrain the body’s coping mechanisms and are known as allostatic overload, hallmarked by maladaptive responses. An illustrative example of this concept is the body's response to iron ion exposure following trauma, transfusion, or haemolysis. Iron ions, at low levels, induce adaptive Nrf2-dependent responses, such as haem oxygenase gene expression. However, high concentrations or prolonged exposure can lead to cellular damage and organ failure, e.g. through the production of highly reactive free radicals. This biphasic pattern highlights the complex interplay between protective and harmful responses in post-trauma physiology. Whereas tools such as the SOFA score allow to measure severity of organ dysfunction, no metrics for quantifying the intensity of ‘stress’ over time are available. As cumulative stress is a crucial outcome-associated factor in trauma care, the development of adequate indicators could significantly enhance our understanding and management of post-trauma complications, arising from secondary surgical interventions, transfusion management, or metabolic derangements. This evolving perspective on stress biology in the severely injured host underscores the need for a more comprehensive approach to patient assessment and treatment in critical care settings, to identify and to decrease stress load with the aim to prevent life-threatening complications, such as sepsis, and ultimately improve outcomes.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Burns & Trauma
Article number: tkaf014

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Dickmann P, Claus RA, Bauer M. Sepsis after trauma—evolving paradigms in stress biology and host response failure. Burns & Trauma, 2025, 13(6): tkaf014. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaf014

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 25 July 2024
Revised: 27 January 2025
Accepted: 07 February 2025
Published: 10 October 2026
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.