AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (760.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Yuki Kotani1,‡, Nicholas Ryan2,‡, Andrew A. Udy2,3, Tomoko Fujii3,4 ( )
Department of Intensive Care, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba 296-8602, Japan
Department of Intensive Care & Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care—Research Centre, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
Department of Intensive Care, Jikei University Hospital, 3-19-18, Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8471, Japan

‡Drs Kotani and Ryan contributed equally to this work as first authors.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• Noradrenaline is effective in increasing systemic vascular resistance and cardiac preload, recommended early in septic shock treatment as per guidelines; however, careful management of catecholamine dosages and the potential side effects, such as arrhythmias and immunomodulatory effects should be noted.

• Vasopressin is known for its effectiveness in vasoconstriction and reducing catecholamine doses, thus decreasing the risk of arrhythmias, and angiotensin II may be a valuable second-line vasopressor for catecholamine-resistant hypotension.

• The critical balance of fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support to optimize tissue perfusion and prevent progression to irreversible shock is of immense importance.

• Novel strategies including methylene blue and hydroxocobalamin may have potential to improve haemodynamics when traditional vasopressors fail, whilst awaiting for ongoing research to validate their effectiveness and safety in critical care settings.

Abstract

Septic shock is a significant challenge in the management of patients with burns and traumatic injuries when complicated by infection, necessitating prompt and effective haemodynamic support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for vasopressor and fluid management in septic shock, with the aim to optimize patient outcomes. With regard to vasopressor management, we elaborate on the pharmacologic profiles and clinical applications of catecholamines, vasopressin derivatives, angiotensin II, and other vasoactive agents. Noradrenaline remains central to septic shock management. The addition of vasopressin, when sequentially added to noradrenaline, offers a non-catecholaminergic vasoactive effect with some clinical benefits and risks of adverse effects. Emerging agents such as angiotensin II and hydroxocobalamin are highlighted for their roles in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Next, for fluid management, crystalloids are currently preferred for initial resuscitation, with balanced crystalloids showing benefits over saline. The application of albumin in septic shock warrants further research. High-quality evidence does not support large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an individualized strategy based on haemodynamic parameters, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, is recommended. The existing knowledge suggests that early vasopressor initiation, particularly noradrenaline, may be critical in cases where fluid resuscitation takes inadequate effect. Management of refractory septic shock remains challenging, with novel agents like angiotensin II and methylene blue showing potential in recent studies. In conclusion, Further research is needed to optimize haemodynamic management of septic shock, particularly in developing novel vasopressor usage and fluid management approaches.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Burns & Trauma
Article number: tkae081

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Kotani Y, Ryan N, Udy AA, et al. Haemodynamic management of septic shock. Burns & Trauma, 2025, 13(1): tkae081. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae081

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

12

Scopus

Received: 20 May 2024
Revised: 09 September 2024
Accepted: 28 November 2024
Published: 10 October 2026
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com