Fungicidal versus fungistatic therapy of invasive Candida infection in non-neutropenic adults: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fungicidal versus fungistatic pharmacotherapy of invasive candidiasis/candidemia yields superior outcomes.

Data sources included MEDLINE (1966–June 2017), EMBASE (1980–June 2017), PubMed (1966–June 2017), Global Health-Ovid (inception to June 2017), LILACS Virtual Health Library (inception to June 2017) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to 2nd quarter 2017). The ClinicalTrial.gov database, the SCOPUS database, SIGLE (System for Information on Grey Literature) and Google Scholar were also utilised to search for relevant studies.

Randomised studies of any pharmacotherapy of invasive candidiasis including candidemia using a fungicidal (amphotericin B or echinocandin compound) versus a fungistatic (triazole) compound in adolescent or adult non-neutropenic patients. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.Pooled odds ratios demonstrated an advantage of fungicidal therapy with respect to early therapeutic success (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27–2.03, p < 0.0001, I² = 0%) and persistence or recurrence of infection (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35–0.74, p = 0.0005, I² = 0%) but no advantage for late survival (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77–1.21, p = 0.77, I² = 0%).

Fungicidal therapy of invasive candidiasis and candidemia is associated with a higher probability of early therapeutic success and decreased probability of persistent or recurrent infection. However, there is no improvement in survival.