AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Comparing the applicability between Landsat and MODIS datasets for eco-environment quality assessment: a case study of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China

Yun LiuaHuimei LiubWeiheng Xub,c ( )Leiguang WangdWeili Koub,cNing LubGuanglong Oua
College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
College of Big Data and Intelligent Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forestry and Ecological Big Data, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) is widely utilized for ecological environment quality (EEQ) assessment. However, the consistency and difference in the application of RSEI constructed from Landsat and MODIS data in plateau regions have not been quantified. We conducted a comparison of RSEI_Landsat (RSEI derived from Landsat datasets) and RSEI_MODIS (RSEI derived from MODIS datasets) for EEQ assessment in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (YGP). Then, the spatio-temporal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of EEQ in the YGP from 2000 to 2022 were explored. The results indicated that: (1) There was a high correlation between RSEI_Landsat and RSEI_MODIS, with the R ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 in the YGP during 2000–2022. However, the RSEI_MODIS values were slightly lower than RSEI_Landsat in the transition years (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2022), with an average bias value of −0.06 and percent change (PC) value of −9.35%. (2) RSEI_Landsat exhibited an obvious advantage and sensitivity for evaluating EEQ and its dynamics compared to RSEI_MODIS in the YGP with high landscape fragmentation. (3) EEQ had a slightly improving trend, with average growth rates of 0.0054 a−1 for RSEI_Landsat and 0.0037 a−1 for RSEI_MODIS from 2000 to 2022 in the YGP. (4) Local spatial heterogeneity of EEQ revealed an increasing trend in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. The study quantitatively evaluated the consistency and difference of the application of RSEI based on Landsat and MODIS datasets in plateau areas, which can provide a reference for the selection of data sources in regional EEQ evaluation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Geo-Spatial Information Science
Pages 2301-2324

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu Y, Liu H, Xu W, et al. Comparing the applicability between Landsat and MODIS datasets for eco-environment quality assessment: a case study of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2026, 29(3): 2301-2324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2025.2587459

1

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 November 2024
Accepted: 05 November 2025
Published: 05 December 2025
© 2025 Wuhan University.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.