AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (907.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Comparison of Concrete Creep-Induced Structural Prestress Loss Calculated by Codes from Different Countries

Fei-ping XU1( )Da-fang LI2Zhong-tian ZHANG1Qing-tao ZHANG1Liang KANG1Ya WEI2
Shandong Hi-speed Co. Ltd., Jinan Shandong 250101, China
Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Creep is an inherent property of concrete materials, and an accurate prediction of creep-induced prestress is critical in designing a prestressed concrete structure. The comparison of codes or specifications of different countries on concrete structures was performed in this study. A basic model of prestress loss caused by creep was first deduced from a simple engineering model, and then the derived model was compared with the calculations obtained by different codes. Results show that the overall fundamentals and considerations of these codes are similar. Among these codes, the formulas specified by the Chinese Codes, European Code (DD ENV 1992-1-1), and AASHTO Code (AASHTO LRFDUS-5-M) were similar to the concrete aging formula, while the ACI Code (ACI 209R-92), Australian Code (ACI 209R-92), and Canadian Code (CSA-S6-06) depended more on empirical coefficients obtained via experiments. In the calculation example, the value of creep coefficient directly affected the calculating result of prestress loss. By comparing of the creep models adopted in Code for Design of Concrete Structures (GB50010-2010), European Code (DD ENV 1992-1-1), ACI Code (ACI 209R-92), and Railway Code (TB10002.3-2005). The effects of input parameters on calculation of creep coefficient were discussed in details. This study revealed the appropriate conditions using different codes.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)
Pages 23-34

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XU F-p, LI D-f, ZHANG Z-t, et al. Comparison of Concrete Creep-Induced Structural Prestress Loss Calculated by Codes from Different Countries. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2019, 13(4): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000701

6

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 11 November 2019
Published: 01 December 2019
© The Editorial Office of Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)