AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (391.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Comparison and Selection of Bridge Type Schemes Based on AHP and Grey Correlation TOPSIS

Quan-min XIE1( )Jian-qiang YIN1,2Wen-dong YANG1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China
CSCEC AECOM Consultants Co., Ltd., Lanzhou Gansu 730000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Determination of the optimal bridge scheme is crucial in the preliminary design stage of bridge construction, and the scientific decision results directly affect the construction and implementation of the whole project. At present, the determination of bridge schemes in mountainous areas is mainly based on empirical judgment, and few theoretical methods can be adopted. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation model was built for mountainous bridge type scheme by the basic AHP theory, grey relational analysis, and TOPSIS. The model comprehensively considered the various factors affecting the selection of bridge type from the aspects of economy, technology, and society, and 12 evaluation indexes were selected to build a comprehensive evaluation system for the bridge type scheme in mountainous areas. Weight vector of valuation indexes of bridge type was calculated by AHP to reduce the influence of human subjective factors. Then, a weighted grey correlation coefficient decision matrix was constructed by fuzzy mathematics theory and grey correlation analysis, and the relative closeness coefficient between the alternative schemes and the Grey correlation ideal solution was calculated by TOPSIS. Finally, the optimal bridge type scheme was determined based on the relative closeness coefficient. The evaluation model was used to judge three alternative bridge type schemes (A1-A3) of a highway in the mountainous area of Pu'an County, Guizhou Province. The relative closeness coefficients of continuous PC T beam bridge (A1), PC continuous rigid frame bridge (A2), and PC dwarf-tower cable-stayed bridge (A3) were respectively 0.597 7, 0.315 6, and 0.400 3, indicating the first scheme is the best optimized bridge type. Thus, the first bridge scheme was applied to actual bridge construction and achieved good economic and social values. The results show that the evaluation model provides a feasible theoretical method for the decision-making of mountain bridge type.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)
Pages 60-67

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XIE Q-m, YIN J-q, YANG W-d. Comparison and Selection of Bridge Type Schemes Based on AHP and Grey Correlation TOPSIS. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2019, 13(1): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000667

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 05 June 2017
Published: 01 March 2019
© The Editorial Office of Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)