AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Integrating process-based and deep learning models for flood simulation in karst basins

Bin-quan Lia,b,c( )Yi-jie XiacSi-ji TaodYun-yao ChencJian-fei ZhaocZhong-min Liangc
State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security in River Basin, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Key Laboratory of Hydrologic-Cycle and Hydrodynamic-System of Ministry of Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Guizhou Water & Power Survey-Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China

Peer review under responsibility of Hohai University.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Flood process simulation in karst basins is challenging due to complex runoff generation and concentration mechanisms, often resulting in low accuracy. This study investigated two typical karst basins (the Maiweng and Liudong river basins) in Guizhou Province, China, and developed two hydrological models for flood simulation: the karst-Xin'anjiang (Karst-XAJ) model, a modified Xin'anjiang (XAJ) hydrological model adapted for karst runoff characteristics, and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model. Their performances were compared, and their results were integrated using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The Karst-XAJ model accurately simulated flood peak time and runoff depth but showed limited peak flow accuracy. The LSTM model performed well within a 2-h computational window, with accuracy declining for longer computational windows (3—4 h) yet maintaining a Nash—Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient above 0.7. The BMA approach further enhanced simulation accuracy beyond individual models. Overall, both models effectively captured flood dynamics in karst basins, with the LSTM model achieving superior precision. This study offers a novel framework for simulating flood processes in karst regions with complex runoff processes.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Water Science and Engineering
Pages 23-34

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li B-q, Xia Y-j, Tao S-j, et al. Integrating process-based and deep learning models for flood simulation in karst basins. Water Science and Engineering, 2026, 19(1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.005

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 April 2025
Accepted: 30 October 2025
Published: 03 December 2025
© 2025 Hohai University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).