AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (10.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

The relationship between circulating osteocalcin and muscle mass measurements in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Quan ZhangaYuzhen XiebTanner JenkinsaJames Carsona,c( )
Integrative Muscle Biology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Motor Neuron Science Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Huffines Institute for Sports Medicine & Human Performance, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Sports Medicine and Health Science

Show Author Information

Abstract

Introduction

Osteocalcin (OC) and the undercarboxylated form (ucOC) are bone-derived peptide hormones produced by osteoblasts that are involved in systemic metabolism and skeletal muscle mass regulation. Human studies have been equivocal regarding the relationship of circulating OC with muscle mass. Our aim was to summarize the published findings on the relationship between OC levels and muscle mass measurements in humans and determine if factors such as age and sex impact the outcome.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and CINHAL databases were systematically searched to identify empirical human studies reporting the correlation coefficients between OC levels and measures of muscle mass. Muscle mass measurements included total body lean mass (tLM), percent lean mass (%LM), appendicular lean mass (aLM), and lean muscle index (LMI). Studies were included in the meta-analysis, with effect sizes being extracted for total OC (tOC) and ucOC. Subgroup analyses examined age, sex, and health status.

Results

Muscle mass quantified by %LM had a significant correlation with tOC and ucOC. LMI had a significant correlation with ucOC, but not tLM, and aLM. There was a weak, significant positive association between tOC and ucOC with all combined muscle mass measurements, and the relationship with tOC was more evident in male adults.

Conclusion

Circulating OC, specifically ucOC, had a significant relationship with %LM, but not tLM or aLM. Circulating OC appears to be more closely associated with body composition than with total mass. Further studies are needed to determine how age and sex interact with OC regulation of body composition.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Pages 509-523

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang Q, Xie Y, Jenkins T, et al. The relationship between circulating osteocalcin and muscle mass measurements in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2026, 8(5): 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2025.12.003

9

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 25 July 2025
Revised: 10 November 2025
Accepted: 12 December 2025
Published: 13 December 2025
© 2025 Chengdu Sport University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).