AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Transpiration responds linearly to Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration and varies genetically, both in individual plants and canopies, in large sorghum and pearl millet panels

Laura GrégoireaJana Kholovab,cSunita ChoudharybRekha BadhambClémentine Denisa,dJeannot Ndioned,eOumar Salld,eCheikh Soced,eRomiel Badjid,eYves VigourouxaVincent Vadeza,d( )
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), University of Montpellier, DIADE Research Unit, Montpellier, 34394, France
International Crops Research Institute in Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, 502324, India
Department of Information Technologies, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500, Czech Republic
Centre d’étude Régional pour l'amélioration de l'adaptation à la sécheresse (CERAAS), Thiès, Senegal
Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (ISRA), Bambey, Senegal
Show Author Information

Abstract

Genetic variation in the transpiration response to evaporative demand has been mostly studied in controlled environments, individual plants, and small genetic panels. Moving outdoors in field-like situations raises questions about what timeframe to measure transpiration, which metric to represent evaporative demand (vapor pressure deficit, VPD or reference evapotranspiration, ETref), which model to describe transpiration responses (linear slopes or segmented breakpoints), which plant spacing (individual plants, canopies), and which experimental setup for heritable genetic variation.

Transpiration responses to evaporative demand were phenotyped in 467 sorghum and pearl millet inbred lines in three contrasting platforms (high-tech, low-tech, and lysimetric systems) outdoors. Across all experiments, ETref consistently explained more variation in transpiration response than VPD. In both species, transpiration responses to increasing ETref were best described by linear relationships. Genotype-specific regression slopes were retained as trait estimates.

In pearl millet, transpiration response slopes and transpiration efficiency exhibited significant genetic variation with high heritability (0.61-0.73) across platforms. In sorghum, trait heritability depended on the platform, with higher heritability in the low-tech. Transpiration efficiency was positively associated with transpiration response slopes in both species, while relationships with root traits revealed species-specific patterns of water use and uptake.

Overall, ETref was a reliable descriptor of evaporative demand, and linear modelling captured transpiration responses to ETref well outdoors. The low-tech platform enabled reliable phenotyping of transpiration response to ETref of individual plants in large germplasm panels while both the high-tech and lysimeter platforms were reliable to measure transpiration response to ETref in canopies.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Plant Phenomics
Article number: 100231

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Grégoire L, Kholova J, Choudhary S, et al. Transpiration responds linearly to Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration and varies genetically, both in individual plants and canopies, in large sorghum and pearl millet panels. Plant Phenomics, 2026, 8(2): 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphe.2026.100231

10

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 February 2026
Revised: 19 May 2026
Accepted: 21 May 2026
Published: 03 June 2026
© 2026 The Authors. Nanjing Agricultural University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).