AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (24.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Enhancing reservoir characterization via lithology-constrained machine learning methods: The deep Jurassic Sangonghe tight sandstones in the Turpan-Hami Basin, China

Hong-Bin Lia,bYin-Hong Tiana,bGui-Wen Wanga,b( )Zhi-Bin Hea,bLin-Bo Shaoa,bJin Laia,b
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

Reliable porosity prediction in deep tight sandstones remains a persistent challenge due to complex lithological heterogeneity and weak correlations between conventional logs and reservoir parameters. This study systematically evaluates the performance of four predictive models, namely SVM, CatBoost, 2-D CNN and LSTM, in predicting NMR-derived effective porosity using nine conventional log curves and lithology as inputs. A total of 190 test samples from well J7-2-3H and blind well validation from the Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in the Turpan-Hami Basin were employed for performance benchmarking. The lithologies are mainly siltstone, fine-grained sandstone, medium-grained sandstone, coarse-grained sandstone, and sandy conglomerate. Results show that CatBoost consistently outperforms both traditional method and the other two deep learning models, achieving the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.94, MAE = 0.24%) and demonstrating superior robustness. SHAP analysis was used to interpret model behavior and confirmed that CatBoost provides physically consistent predictions, assigning geologically reasonable weights to key features such as gamma ray, density, and lithology. The model–data compatibility and the structured treatment of discrete geological information are essential for enhancing predictive performance. Furthermore, lithology serves not only as an auxiliary input but also as a soft petrophysical constraint that enables improved model generalization across heterogeneous reservoirs. Despite the greater architectural complexity of deep learning models, their limited capacity to handle categorical features under data-scarce conditions results in suboptimal performance compared to CatBoost. This study presents a comparative modeling framework and interpretability strategy for evaluating reservoir parameter prediction models, emphasizing the value of incorporating geological priors in data-driven workflows. Medium- and coarse-grained sandstones exhibit relatively high porosity, with the latter showing a slightly superior porosity range. The proposed approach offers practical guidance for algorithm selection and feature engineering in intelligent reservoir characterization. This methodology enables precise calculation of reservoir parameters for deep tight sandstone reservoirs in the absence of NMR logging tools, thereby providing both theoretical frameworks and technical support for reservoir evaluation and reserve assessment of deep tight sandstones.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 4505-4527

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li H-B, Tian Y-H, Wang G-W, et al. Enhancing reservoir characterization via lithology-constrained machine learning methods: The deep Jurassic Sangonghe tight sandstones in the Turpan-Hami Basin, China. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(8): 4505-4527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.05.021

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 September 2025
Revised: 28 January 2026
Accepted: 15 May 2026
Published: 20 May 2026
© 2026

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).