AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Machine learning–driven prediction of profile control effect in oil reservoir based on relative production difference

Kun Xiea,bZhan-Qi Wua,bXuan-Shuo Tiana,cWei-Jia Caoa,b( )Xin SongdEr-Long Yanga,bKun Yana,bXiang-Guo Lua,b
Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery of Ministry of Education, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, Heilongjiang, China
State Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Oil, Daqing, 163712, Heilongjiang, China
College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
CNOOC (China) Limited Tianjin Branch, Tianjin, 300459, China

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Edited by Meng-Jiao Zhou

Show Author Information

Abstract

Traditional methods for predicting profile control effect have limited accuracy, with deviations of varying degrees between predicted and actual oil production after operation. In order to solve this problem, this study introduces a prediction method of profile control effect based on relative production difference (PRD). Initially, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) network, and Transformer neural network were used to predict the benchmark production of water flooding. Subsequently, the study identified factors influencing profile control effect as input features and the relative difference between benchmark production of water flooding and post-treatment actual production as the target output. Then three machine learning models were constructed for prediction of profile control effect, namely Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest (RF). Hyperparameters of all models were optimized using the Optuna framework during training process. Finally, the study applied the optimal profile control effect prediction model to predict the profile control effect in S reservoir. The results show that LSTM performs the best in predicting the benchmark production of water flooding, with R2 values of 0.9874 and 0.9508 for the training and test sets, respectively. RF performs the best in predicting the profile control effect, with R2 values of 0.9988 and 0.9995 for the test and cross validation sets, respectively. In oilfield applications, the test set R2 of RF exceeds 0.9, which proves that the predicted production after profile control is highly consistent with the actual production, and the model has strong generalization ability.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 5706-5722

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xie K, Wu Z-Q, Tian X-S, et al. Machine learning–driven prediction of profile control effect in oil reservoir based on relative production difference. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(9): 5706-5722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.04.021

9

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 20 November 2025
Revised: 14 January 2026
Accepted: 14 April 2026
Published: 21 April 2026
© 2026

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).