AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (22.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Experimental study on vertical propagation of hydraulic fracturing in multilayer permeability heterogeneous reservoirs: Based on true triaxial experiment and acoustic emission monitoring

Lin-Hao Zoua,b,cWei Lia,b,c,dYi-Nao Sub( )Huan Zhaoa,b,cJing-Ming Gaia,b
Key Laboratory for Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, Heilongjiang, China
College of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, Heilongjiang, China
Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Stimulation, Daqing, 163000, Heilongjiang, China
National Engineering Research Center of Oil & Gas Drilling and Completion Technology, Beijing, 102206, China

Edited by Jia-Jia Fei

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

To investigate the influence mechanisms of formation permeability on hydraulic fracture vertical propagation behavior in the southern Songliao Basin of China, this study constructed a physical experimental model simulating multilayer permeability heterogeneous reservoirs. Through true triaxial hydraulic fracturing experiments combined with quantitative fracture area measurement, 3D fracture reconstruction, and real-time AE monitoring, systematic analysis was performed on key geological and engineering factors affecting fracture vertical extension. The results indicate that three typical distribution patterns exist in heterogeneous permeability formations: ascending pattern, sandwiched pattern, and leaping pattern. Interlayer permeability contrast significantly controls fracture propagation, with hydraulic fractures preferentially extending into high-permeability layers while low-permeability layers experience substantial suppression due to fluid competition. As the permeability ratio between adjacent layers and target layers increases, the fracture height-to-length ratio exhibits an upward trend. To quantitatively characterize cross-layer fracture propagation behavior, a critical threshold Kϕ was innovatively defined. When Kϕ ≤ 0.5, fractures are permeability gradient dominated; when Kϕ > 0.5, the regime transitions to middle layer weighting dominance. Increasing injection rate reduces fracturing fluid leak-off at weak interfaces, concentrating hydraulic energy at fracture tips to enhance penetration capacity into low-permeability layers. Low-viscosity fracturing fluids optimize fracture area distribution while maintaining cross-layer propagation capability. Vertical stress contrast positively correlates with fracture extension capacity in high-permeability layers but negatively correlates in low-permeability layers due to hydraulic isolation effects. These findings provide deeper insights into fracture geometry and propagation mechanisms in multilayer heterogeneous permeability formations, offering theoretical foundations for optimizing hydraulic fracturing design parameters.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 4773-4791

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zou L-H, Li W, Su Y-N, et al. Experimental study on vertical propagation of hydraulic fracturing in multilayer permeability heterogeneous reservoirs: Based on true triaxial experiment and acoustic emission monitoring. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(8): 4773-4791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.03.054

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 October 2025
Revised: 24 March 2026
Accepted: 24 March 2026
Published: 28 March 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).