AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (24.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

STISR: A stacked tucker implicit seismic reparameterization framework for 3D seismic data denoising

Qing-Fang WangaDa-Wei Liua( )Mauricio D. SacchibXiao-Kai WangaDe-Yu MengcWen-Chao Chena
The School of Information and Communication Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China
The Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Alberta, Canada
The School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China

Edited by Meng-Jiao Zhou

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

High-quality seismic data are critical for characterizing complex geological reservoirs, yet persistent noise contamination remains challenging. Parameterization methods separate signals from noise by expressing seismic data as mathematical models. While linear approaches like Tucker decomposition effectively impose low-rank constraints to isolate structured seismic reflections, they lack the nonlinear expressiveness required for complex stratigraphic features. Conversely, like implicit neural representations (INR), nonlinear parameterization achieves enhanced expressiveness through continuous nonlinear mappings, leveraging spectral bias to suppress high-frequency noise. However, this strength paradoxically becomes a limitation in high-frequency regimes: without explicit structural guidance, INRs sacrifice structural fidelity and struggle to distinguish subtle geological features (e.g., fault edges, pinch-outs) from spectrally overlapping noise, resulting in over-smoothed structures or amplified high-frequency artifacts. Recent advances in reparameterization methods demonstrate promising noise suppression through enhanced model expressiveness. To resolve this expressiveness-stability tradeoff, we propose Stacked Tucker Implicit Seismic Reparameterization (STISR), a hybrid framework that synergizes Tucker's low-rank structural anchors with INR's high-expressiveness nonlinear approximation. Tucker decomposition in STISR provides a noise-reduced, structured initialization to guide INR optimization, effectively regularizing the neural representation to maintain coherent reflection structures. Then, the neural network nonlinearly reparameterizes the Tucker decomposition, further enhancing its expressiveness and recovering subtle features beyond linear subspace constraints. A progressive hierarchical re-decomposition strategy applies linear reparameterization to the Tucker core tensor, iteratively optimizing it across scales and reinforcing low-rank stability while adaptively allocating expressiveness to resolve fine-scale features. To address the heterogeneity of noise in field seismic data, we introduce l1 regularization, which adjusts the sparsity threshold based on residual noise, enabling targeted handling of diverse noise distributions. Validation on synthetic and field pre-stack datasets confirms STISR's superiority in balancing computational efficiency, structural fidelity, and noise rejection compared to conventional tensor decomposition or pure neural network approaches.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 5384-5399

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang Q-F, Liu D-W, Sacchi MD, et al. STISR: A stacked tucker implicit seismic reparameterization framework for 3D seismic data denoising. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(9): 5384-5399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.03.048

12

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 August 2025
Revised: 28 January 2026
Accepted: 23 March 2026
Published: 30 March 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).