AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (26.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Multi-component composite steam flooding (MCCSF) expanding steam chamber and suppressing water invasion in edge-water heavy oil reservoirs: A comparative 3D experimental study

Qing-Jing HongaZhan-Xi Panga( )Peng TangaXiao-Hong LiubBo Wangc
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Tianjin Branch of China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) Ltd., Tianjin, 300452, China
Henan Oilfield Institute, Sinopec China, Nanyang, 473400, Henan, China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

The development of heavy oil reservoirs with edge-water presents significant challenges during pure steam flooding (PSF), including steam override, severe channeling, limited displacement/sweep efficiency, and water invasion. To address these issues, multi-component composite steam flooding (MCCSF) was proposed as an improved steam flooding (SF) method. This study introduced a novel three-dimensional (3D) physical simulation approach that accurately replicated the recovery process in edge-water reservoirs. Additionally, a new similarity criterion number was proposed to characterize edge-water energy conversion. Then, comparative experiments (Exp. A: PSF; Exp. B: MCCSF) were conducted to elucidate the advantages and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) mechanisms of MCCSF. Results demonstrated that MCCSF effectively accelerated the thermal connection between wells, mitigated steam override, and improved steam thermal utilization. Compared with PSF, MCCSF achieved higher peak oil production rate and longer stable production stage. In heterogeneous reservoirs with structural dip, MCCSF generated a more uniform steam chamber and reduced the performance gap between higher and lower wells. Post-displacement oil saturation in the middle and upper main layers was typically 7%–10% lower under MCCSF than under PSF. Furthermore, MCCSF significantly suppressed the degree and extent of edge-water invasion in the lower reservoir zones. The final oil recovery factor of MCCSF reached 55.37%, representing an 11.71% improvement over PSF. This study established a scalable laboratory methodology and revealed the coupled displacement mechanisms of steam–gas–chemical system under edge-water conditions, offering both theoretical insights and experimental support for optimizing thermal recovery in heavy oil reservoirs.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
petsci-23-4-2086_ESM.pdf (855.9 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 2086-2105

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Hong Q-J, Pang Z-X, Tang P, et al. Multi-component composite steam flooding (MCCSF) expanding steam chamber and suppressing water invasion in edge-water heavy oil reservoirs: A comparative 3D experimental study. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(4): 2086-2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.01.018

211

Views

1

Downloads

3

Crossref

1

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 August 2025
Revised: 13 January 2026
Accepted: 13 January 2026
Published: 21 January 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).