AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Pore structure-controlled CO2 huff-n-puff efficiency in Jimusar shale oil reservoirs: Insights from classified oil reservoirs

Qing Lia,bYing-Yan LicPei-Yu LiaJi-Xiang HecYi-Lei Songa,dChi-Yang YucZhao-Jie Songa ( )Hao-Chen Rena
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China
Exploration and Development Research Institution, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China
School of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) at Karamay, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

CO2 huff-n-puff is a promising enhanced oil recovery technique for shale oil reservoirs, but its efficiency in relation to pore structure across classified oil reservoirs remains unclear. This study investigates three reservoir classes (Types Ⅰ–Ⅲ) in the Jimusar Sag using high pressure mercury intrusion, nitrogen adsorption, and NMR to characterize pore architectures. Results show that the shale cores from the Jimusar shale oil reservoir are overall dominated by medium pores, with generally small pore radii. Among them, the Type Ⅰ oil reservoir class has a higher proportion of large pores (> 300 nm), whereas the Type Ⅲ oil reservoir class has a higher proportion of small pores (< 50 nm) than the other two classes. Online NMR monitored CO2 huff-n-puff experiments under reservoir conditions (363.15 K, injection pressure > 24 MPa) reveal significant cumulative oil recovery differences: 56.36% (Type Ⅰ), 46.81% (Type Ⅱ), and 28.30% (Type Ⅲ) after four cycles. Recovery correlates with pore size: The Type Ⅰ oil reservoir class, with a higher proportion of large pores, exhibits stronger CO2 flow capacity, whereas the Type Ⅲ oil reservoir class, with a larger proportion of small pores, significantly restricts oil mobilization. A second derivative analysis of the recovery–pore radius curve quantifies mobilization thresholds, indicating a lower limit effective pore radius of 20–35 nm. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing injection pressure more effectively improves recovery and lowers the mobilization threshold than extending soaking time.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 2030-2045

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li Q, Li Y-Y, Li P-Y, et al. Pore structure-controlled CO2 huff-n-puff efficiency in Jimusar shale oil reservoirs: Insights from classified oil reservoirs. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(4): 2030-2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.12.033

122

Views

4

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 June 2025
Revised: 20 December 2025
Accepted: 21 December 2025
Published: 24 December 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).