AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (11.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Investigating residual oil distribution and CO2-EOR mechanisms in sand-conglomerate reservoirs using integrated CT and NMR techniques

Jun-Rong Liua,bRun-Dong Gonga,bDeng-Feng Zhanga,b,cWen-Yue Suna,bKai-Ning Hea,bShu-Yang Liua,b( )
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
CNPC Engineering Technology Research Co., Ltd., Tianjin, 300451, China

Edited by Meng-Jiao Zhou

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

Sand-conglomerate reservoirs, comprising cemented sand grains and gravels, exhibit strong heterogeneity and complex flow behavior, which often result in poor sweep efficiency and low recovery during waterflooding. To enhance oil recovery, a clear understanding of residual oil distribution and the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) mechanisms is essential. This study employed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Computed Tomography (CT) scanning to investigate the distribution of residual oil after waterflooding and to evaluate the EOR mechanisms of CO2 flooding, CO2-water-alternating-gas (CO2-WAG) flooding, and CO2 intermittent injection. Results show that the residual oil is predominantly “bypassed oil” trapped in macropores behind coarse gravels, with macropores accounting for 77.6% of the total residual oil. This is primarily due to gravel-induced shielding and flow bypassing, which significantly reduce sweep efficiency. All three CO2 injection strategies effectively mobilize “bypassed oil”, and intermittent CO2 flooding achieves a higher CO2-oil displacement efficiency than the other two. During intermittent CO2 flooding, CO2 not only partially extracts oil from the dominant channels but also dissolves into the “bypassed oil”, causing oil to swell, enter the flow channel and then be produced. Additionally, increasing soaking time and cycle number can effectively improve the performance of this strategy. Extending soaking time enhance the contact between CO2 and “bypassed oil”, which is a key EOR mechanism. However, the incremental recovery diminishes with longer soaking time, potentially reducing overall operational efficiency. Thus, optimizing the operational parameters of these strategies requires further investigation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 1348-1359

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu J-R, Gong R-D, Zhang D-F, et al. Investigating residual oil distribution and CO2-EOR mechanisms in sand-conglomerate reservoirs using integrated CT and NMR techniques. Petroleum Science, 2026, 23(3): 1348-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.11.047

146

Views

2

Downloads

3

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 18 September 2025
Revised: 03 November 2025
Accepted: 28 November 2025
Published: 04 December 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).