AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (33.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Real-time NMR experimental study of displacement–imbibition coupling in tight/shale oil reservoirs: Lithological variations, influencing factors, and key insights

Bin-Yu Wanga,bRen-Yi Caoa ( )Xin-Yi ZhengaLin-Song ChengaJiang-Peng HuaZhi-Hao JiaaWen-Hao DuancHassan Hassanzadehb
College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

Displacement–imbibition coupling production is a pivotal technology for enhancing oil recovery (EOR) in waterflooded tight/shale oil reservoirs. However, the microscopic fluid transport mechanisms across different pore scales remain inadequately understood. This study presents an innovative real-time nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experimental system integrated with MRI-based image processing to dynamically monitor oil–water distribution and quantify local oil saturation during injection–shut-in–production. This approach enables quantitative evaluation of pore utilization across different pore size ranges and reveals the impacts of various driving forces on oil displacement efficiency. The results show that displacement–imbibition coupling production employs multiple mechanisms to achieve balanced contributions from pores of all size scales. The displacement–imbibition oil production mainly consists of three stages: displacement-dominated injection, capillary-driven imbibition during shut-in, and displacement–imbibition coupling effects during production. Pressure oscillations significantly enhance matrix–fracture exchange by lowering pore-throat entry thresholds and redistributing pressure fields. Quantitative analysis shows that large pore dominate early displacement, while small pore contribute more during imbibition. Lithology and pore-throat connectivity critically influence displacement efficiency; vitric tuff outperforms argillaceous siltstone by up to 11.8%. Notably, greater fracture complexity increases the oil–water contact area, enhancing capillary imbibition, reducing reliance on displacement forces, and increasing the contribution of displacement–imbibition coupling effects to oil displacement efficiency by 15.35%. Artificially modifying the pressure field to induce pressure oscillations, effectively utilizing the high conductivity of fractures, and fully leveraging the displacement–imbibition coupling effects within matrix pores are crucial for achieving optimal EOR. Lastly, a new concept of nonlinear flow zoning is introduced to describe spatial variations in flow behavior under complex coupling conditions. These experimentally validated insights into matrix–fracture interactions provide theoretical support for designing improved waterflooding strategies and optimizing oil recovery in tight and shale reservoirs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 5142-5165

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang B-Y, Cao R-Y, Zheng X-Y, et al. Real-time NMR experimental study of displacement–imbibition coupling in tight/shale oil reservoirs: Lithological variations, influencing factors, and key insights. Petroleum Science, 2025, 22(12): 5142-5165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.08.028

179

Views

1

Downloads

6

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 05 January 2025
Revised: 20 August 2025
Accepted: 20 August 2025
Published: 27 August 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).