AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Enhanced oil recovery with a thermo-thickening viscoelastic surfactant: A comparison with polymer

Mo-Yi Lia, Quan Yina, Bo Lib, Rui-Bo Caob, Yan Zhanga, Xue-Zhi Zhaoa( ), Yu-Jun Fenga( )
Polymer Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymer Materials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
EOR Laboratory, Exploration & Development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Company of PetroChina, Daqing, 163712, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Peer review under the responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).

Show Author Information

Abstract

High-molecular-weight partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) has extensively used in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process; however, it suffers from poor injectivity into low-permeability oil reservoirs and compromised long-term thermal stability under reservoir conditions. To address these challenges, a viscoelastic surfactant, 3-(N-erucamidopropyl-N,N-dimethyl ammonium) betaine (EDAB), was developed and systematically compared with HPAM. Experimental results demonstrate that EDAB outperforms HPAM in thermal resilience, salt tolerance, and interfacial activity. Unlike HPAM's thermal thinning behavior, EDAB displays thermo-thickening properties, with viscosity rising from 225 to 366 mPa·s as temperature increases from 25 to 55 ℃. EDAB maintains 100% viscosity retention under 80 mg·L−1 Ca2+ or Mg2+, whereas HPAM experiences 46% viscosity loss under identical ionic conditions. Core-flooding tests conducted under simulated Daqing oil reservoir conditions indicate that EDAB achieves a 1.4% higher incremental oil recovery factor than HPAM with equal initial solution concentration. When HPAM was employed as a mobility control for pre- or post-flush, EDAB elevates the recovery factor by 13.9% over water flooding. These comparative analyses underscore the potential of EDAB as a thermally stable, salt-insensitive alternative to HPAM, offering an optimized chemical strategy for EOR in challenging reservoir environments. The findings provide empirical validation for surfactant-based solutions to address HPAM's operational constraints in low-permeability formations.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 5176-5188

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li M-Y, Yin Q, Li B, et al. Enhanced oil recovery with a thermo-thickening viscoelastic surfactant: A comparison with polymer. Petroleum Science, 2025, 22(12): 5176-5188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.08.007

973

Views

5

Downloads

12

Crossref

11

Web of Science

11

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 February 2025
Revised: 27 July 2025
Accepted: 04 August 2025
Published: 08 August 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).