AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Mechanical differences of laminations and crack propagation mechanism of continental shale

Yong-Ting Duana,b( )Cheng-Cheng Zhua,bPathegama Gamage RanjithcBai-Cun Yangd( )Tian-Qiao MaoeYu Lid
Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, Liaoning, China
Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province on Deep Engineering and Intelligent Technology, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, Liaoning, China
Deep Earth Energy Laboratory, Building 60, Monash University, 3800, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, Liaoning, China
Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

Clarify the mechanical properties of different laminations and the fracture mechanism of continental shale under in-situ stress can provide theoretical basis for more comprehensive evaluation of the fracability of continental shale oil reservoir. The Chang 72 continental shale was used to investigate the mechanical properties of laminations and the effect of natural structure on the crack propagation of the shale. The XRD and thin section tests show that the laminations contain two types: bright sandy lamination with void structure and dark muddy lamination with layer structure. The real-time CT uniaxial compression tests were conducted to investigate the differences of mechanical properties between the muddy lamination and sandy lamination. It found that the uniaxial compression strength and elastic modulus of the sandy lamination are higher, forming a simple crack with large opening, and the Poisson's ratio of the muddy lamination is large, forming obvious lateral deformation and more secondary cracks. On this basis, the cuboid-shaped continental shale specimens were tested under true triaxial compression conditions to study the effect of laminations and interface cracks on crack propagation combining AE and CT techniques. It found that nascent cracks connected laminations and interface cracks to form fracture network under appropriate loading condition, tensile cracks developed in sandy lamination and shear cracks occurred in muddy lamination because of deformation dissonance and brittleness index differences, and more secondary cracks formed in muddy lamination with smaller fracture toughness. Moreover, the combination relationships between nascent and natural cracks mainly conclude direct penetration and deflection, which is affected by the filling degree and morphology of interface cracks and the relationship of lamination types. These conclusions show that laminar continental shale is conducive to forming complex fracture network, which can provide a theoretical basis for the proposal of indicators and methods for fracability evaluation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 1653-1669

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Duan Y-T, Zhu C-C, Ranjith PG, et al. Mechanical differences of laminations and crack propagation mechanism of continental shale. Petroleum Science, 2025, 22(4): 1653-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.01.006

750

Views

4

Downloads

7

Crossref

6

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 20 August 2024
Revised: 08 January 2025
Accepted: 15 January 2025
Published: 17 January 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).