AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Liquid injectivity in a SAG foam process: Effect of permeability

Jia-Kun Gonga,d( ), Yuan Wangb, Ridhwan-Zhafri B. Kamarul Bahrimc, Raj-Deo Tewaric, Mohammad-Iqbal Mahamad Amirc, Rouhi Farajzadehd,e, William Rossend
College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, Jiangsu, China
College of Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, Jiangsu, China
PETRONAS, Kuala Lumpur, 50088, Malaysia
Department of Geoscience and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN, Delft, the Netherlands
Shell Global Solutions International B.V., 1031 HW, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

Foam is utilized in enhanced oil recovery and CO2 sequestration. Surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) is a preferred approach for placing foam into reservoirs, due to it enhances gas injection and minimizes corrosion in facilities. Our previous studies with similar permeability cores show that during SAG injection, several banks occupy the area near the well where fluid exhibits distinct behaviour. However, underground reservoirs are heterogeneous, often layered. It is crucial to understand the effect of permeability on fluid behaviour and injectivity in a SAG process. In this work, coreflood experiments are conducted in cores with permeabilities ranging from 16 to 2300 mD. We observe the same sequence of banks in cores with different permeabilities. However, the speed at which banks propagate and their overall mobility can vary depending on permeability. At higher permeabilities, the gas-dissolution bank and the forced-imbibition bank progress more rapidly during liquid injection. The total mobilities of both banks decrease with permeability. By utilizing a bank-propagation model, we scale up our experimental findings and compare them to results obtained using the Peaceman equation. Our findings reveal that the liquid injectivity in a SAG foam process is misestimated by conventional simulators based on the Peaceman equation. The lower the formation permeability, the greater the error.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 302-314

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Gong J-K, Wang Y, Kamarul Bahrim R-ZB, et al. Liquid injectivity in a SAG foam process: Effect of permeability. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(1): 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.10.010

550

Views

10

Downloads

7

Crossref

7

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 06 June 2023
Revised: 12 October 2023
Accepted: 12 October 2023
Published: 13 October 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).