AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

A hybrid machine learning optimization algorithm for multivariable pore pressure prediction

Song Denga, Hao-Yu Pana, Hai-Ge Wangb, Shou-Kun Xua( ), Xiao-Peng Yana, Chao-Wei Lia, Ming-Guo Penga, Hao-Ping Penga, Lin Shia, Meng Cuic, Fei Zhaoc
School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, Jiangsu, China
Tubular Goods Research Institute of CNPC, Beijing, 102249, China
CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company Limited, Beijing, 102206, China

Edited by Jia-Jia Fei

Show Author Information

Abstract

Pore pressure is essential data in drilling design, and its accurate prediction is necessary to ensure drilling safety and improve drilling efficiency. Traditional methods for predicting pore pressure are limited when forming particular structures and lithology. In this paper, a machine learning algorithm and effective stress theorem are used to establish the transformation model between rock physical parameters and pore pressure. This study collects data from three wells. Well 1 had 881 data sets for model training, and Wells 2 and 3 had 538 and 464 data sets for model testing. In this paper, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) are selected as the machine learning algorithms for pore pressure modeling. In addition, this paper uses the grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm, particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, sparrow search algorithm (SSA), and bat algorithm (BA) to establish a hybrid machine learning optimization algorithm, and proposes an improved grey wolf optimization (IGWO) algorithm. The IGWO-MLP model obtained the minimum root mean square error (RMSE) by using the 5-fold cross-validation method for the training data. For the pore pressure data in Well 2 and Well 3, the coefficients of determination (R2) of SVM, RF, XGB, and MLP are 0.9930 and 0.9446, 0.9943 and 0.9472, 0.9945 and 0.9488, 0.9949 and 0.9574. MLP achieves optimal performance on both training and test data, and the MLP model shows a high degree of generalization. It indicates that the IGWO-MLP is an excellent predictor of pore pressure and can be used to predict pore pressure.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 535-550

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Deng S, Pan H-Y, Wang H-G, et al. A hybrid machine learning optimization algorithm for multivariable pore pressure prediction. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(1): 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.09.001

708

Views

10

Downloads

42

Crossref

42

Web of Science

47

Scopus

7

CSCD

Received: 27 December 2022
Revised: 29 May 2023
Accepted: 04 September 2023
Published: 09 September 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).