AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Hydrocarbon generation differences of shales composed of green algal and cyanobacteria: A case study of Mesozoic and Cenozoic saline lacustrine shales in Junggar Basin, NW China

Miao Yua,b, Gang Gaoa,b( ), Wan-Yun Mac,d,e, Miao Liua,b, Ni Zhouc,d,e, You-Jin Zhanga,b, Dan Hec,d,e, Ke-Ting Fana,b, Liu-Lin-Bo Guoa,b, Jie Lia,b
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China
Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China
Research Institute of Experimental Testing, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China
Xinjiang Conglomerate Reservoir Laboratory, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China
Key Laboratory of Exploration and Development of Conglomerate Reservoirs, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China

Edited by Jie Hao and Teng Zhu

Show Author Information

Abstract

The Mesozoic and Cenozoic strata in the Junggar basin developed two sets of shallow to semi-deep lacustrine shale, namely, the Cretaceous Qingshuihe Formation (K1q) and the Paleogene Anjihaihe Formation (E2-3a). Through organic petrology and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation, it is found that the primary hydrocarbon-generating organic matter (OM) in the two sets of strata is different. The biological precursor of the E2-3a OM is mainly green algae (Pediastrum), while the precursor of K1q kerogen is mainly cyanobacteria (Oscillatoria). Then, the E2-3a green algae-rich shale and K1q cyanobacteria-rich shale were subjected to hydrous pyrolysis and kinetic analysis, respectively. The results show that the evolution modes of hydrocarbon generation of the typical shales are very different. Green algae have the characteristics of a low oil generation threshold, heavy oil quality, and no prominent oil peak, while cyanobacteria have the characteristics of late oil generation, concentrated hydrocarbon generation, and relatively light oil quality. The characteristics of oil generation can also be well reflected in the composition evolution of the crude oil components. The carbon isotope of gas, kerogen, and extracts of the E2-3a green algae-rich shale are significantly heavier than the K1q cyanobacteria-rich shale, which may be related to the living habits of their biological precursors, carbon source usage, photosynthesis efficiency, and carbon fixation efficiency.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 3348-3362

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yu M, Gao G, Ma W-Y, et al. Hydrocarbon generation differences of shales composed of green algal and cyanobacteria: A case study of Mesozoic and Cenozoic saline lacustrine shales in Junggar Basin, NW China. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(6): 3348-3362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.08.023

515

Views

5

Downloads

8

Crossref

8

Web of Science

10

Scopus

2

CSCD

Received: 25 October 2022
Revised: 26 July 2023
Accepted: 20 August 2023
Published: 21 August 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).