AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Investigation of influence factors on CO2 flowback characteristics and optimization of flowback parameters during CO2 dry fracturing in tight gas reservoirs

Xiao-Mei Zhoua,b, Lei Lia,b ( ), Yong-Quan Sunc, Ran Liuc, Ying-Chun Guod, Yong-Mao Haoa,b, Yu-Liang Sua,b
National Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
Shengli Oil Field Dongsheng Jinggong Petroleum Development (GROUP) Stock Co., Ltd., Dongying, 257000, Shandong, China
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying, 257000, Shandong, China

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

CO2 dry fracturing is a promising alternative method to water fracturing in tight gas reservoirs, especially in water-scarce areas such as the Loess Plateau. The CO2 flowback efficiency is a critical factor that affects the final gas production effect. However, there have been few studies focusing on the flowback characteristics after CO2 dry fracturing. In this study, an extensive core-to-field scale study was conducted to investigate CO2 flowback characteristics and CH4 production behavior. Firstly, to investigate the impact of core properties and production conditions on CO2 flowback, a series of laboratory experiments at the core scale were conducted. Then, the key factors affecting the flowback were analyzed using the grey correlation method based on field data. Finally, taking the construction parameters of Well S60 as an example, a dual-permeability model was used to characterize the different seepage fields in the matrix and fracture for tight gas reservoirs. The production parameters after CO2 dry fracturing were then optimized. Experimental results demonstrate that CO2 dry fracturing is more effective than slickwater fracturing, with a 9.2% increase in CH4 recovery. The increase in core permeability plays a positive role in improving CH4 production and CO2 flowback. The soaking process is mainly affected by CO2 diffusion, and the soaking time should be controlled within 12 h. Increasing the flowback pressure gradient results in a significant increase in both CH4 recovery and CO2 flowback efficiency. While, an increase in CO2 injection is not conducive to CH4 production and CO2 flowback. Based on the experimental and field data, the important factors affecting flowback and production were comprehensively and effectively discussed. The results show that permeability is the most important factor, followed by porosity and effective thickness. Considering flowback efficiency and the influence of proppant reflux, the injection volume should be the minimum volume that meets the requirements for generating fractures. The soaking time should be short which is 1 day in this study, and the optimal bottom hole flowback pressure should be set at 10 MPa. This study aims to improve the understanding of CO2 dry fracturing in tight gas reservoirs and provide valuable insights for optimizing the process parameters.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 3553-3566

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhou X-M, Li L, Sun Y-Q, et al. Investigation of influence factors on CO2 flowback characteristics and optimization of flowback parameters during CO2 dry fracturing in tight gas reservoirs. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(6): 3553-3566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.08.011

502

Views

9

Downloads

6

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 December 2022
Revised: 06 August 2023
Accepted: 08 August 2023
Published: 09 August 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).