AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Experimental investigation of gaseous solvent huff-n-puff in the Middle Bakken Formation

Samuel Asante Afari( ), Kegang Ling, Demetrius Maxey, Billel Sennaoui, Jerjes Hurtado Porlles
Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, 2844 Campus Rd, Stop 8154, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-6116, USA

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

The efficacy of gaseous solvents in enhancing oil recovery (EOR) in unconventional reservoirs and the influence of operational and design parameters are still debated among the oil recovery research community. This work investigated the recovery-enhancing capabilities of two potent gaseous solvents, CO2 and ethane, in tight core samples. Laboratory huff-n-puff (H-n-P) experiments were conducted under three miscibility conditions to investigate the influence of the key operating parameters and the dependency of their impact on the miscibility conditions and gas composition. The results show that oil recovery increased with increasing pressure from below (BM) to above (AM) miscibility pressure in a non-linear trend, irrespective of the gas composition. Furthermore, the influence of the soak period was noticeably dependent on the miscibility condition, specifically more remarkable under AM conditions and less apparent under BM conditions. Likewise, the effect of the production period was more pronounced at AM conditions for both gases. Finally, the impact of rock surface area-to-volume (SA/V) was only observed at BM, where both gases recovered more oil in the core samples with high SA/V. In general, ethane showed a higher efficacy for oil recovery than CO2; CO2 recovered 21%–70% of oil in small core samples, while ethane could recover 32%–88%. The highest recovery was achieved with ethane injected under AM conditions, with a prolonged soak time, a short production period and into a core sample with a high SA/V. We believe the findings from this work will help better understand and design H-n-P EOR projects.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 3488-3497

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Afari SA, Ling K, Maxey D, et al. Experimental investigation of gaseous solvent huff-n-puff in the Middle Bakken Formation. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(6): 3488-3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.07.007

574

Views

9

Downloads

8

Crossref

9

Web of Science

10

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 February 2023
Revised: 07 July 2023
Accepted: 09 July 2023
Published: 11 July 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).