AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Temporal variations in geochemistry of hydraulic fracturing fluid and flowback water in a tight oil reservoir

Jie TianaLiang Wanga( )Li-Pin NibLi-Wei MoucShu-Te SuaMehdi Ostadhassand( )
College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan, China
Geological Research Institute, CNPC Logging, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China
Exploration and Development Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Branch, PetroChina, Karamay, 834000, Xinjiang, China
Institute of Geosciences, Marine and Land Geomechanics and Geotectonics, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, 24118, Germany

Edited by Yan-Hua Sun

Show Author Information

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing facilitates the development and exploitation of unconventional reservoirs. In this study, the injected hydraulic fracturing fluid (HFF) and flowback and produced water (FPW) in tight oil reservoirs of the Lucaogou Formation in the Junggar Basin are temporally sampled from day 1 to day 64. Freshwater is used for fracturing, and HFF is obtained. The chemical and isotopic parameters (including the water type, total salinity, total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, concentrations of Na+, Cl, Ba+, K+, Fe2+ + Fe3+, and CO32−, δD, and δ18O) are experimentally obtained, and their variations with time are systematically analyzed based on the flowback water. The results show that the water type, Na/Cl ratio, total salinity, and TDS of the FPW change periodically primarily due to the HFF mixing with formation water, thus causing δD and δ18O to deviate from the meteoric water line of Xinjiang. Because of water–rock interaction (WRI), the concentrations of Fe2+ + Fe3+ and CO32− of the FPW increase over time, with the solution pH becoming more alkaline. Furthermore, based on the significant changes observed in the geochemistry of the FPW, three separate time intervals of flowback time are identified: Stage Ⅰ (< 10 days), where the FPW is dominated by the HFF and the changes in ions and isotopes are mainly caused by the WRI; Stage Ⅱ (10–37 days), where the FPW is dominated by the addition of formation water to the HFF and the WRI is weakened; and finally, Stage Ⅲ (> 37 days), where the FPW is dominated by the chemistry of the formation water. The methodology implemented in this study can provide critical support for the source identification of formation water.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
petsci-20-5-3013_ESM.pdf (266.6 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 3013-3021

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tian J, Wang L, Ni L-P, et al. Temporal variations in geochemistry of hydraulic fracturing fluid and flowback water in a tight oil reservoir. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(5): 3013-3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.05.004

375

Views

2

Downloads

6

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 12 September 2022
Revised: 26 April 2023
Accepted: 08 May 2023
Published: 16 May 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).